Jump to content

X-T5 with XF10-24 lens


SGinNorcal
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I am a new Fuji user and just joined the forum.  I have a question that I don't see addressed previously, hopefully I searched correctly.

Anyway, I purchased the X-T5 in December on release.  I spent a great deal of time looking at various camera systems, settling first on APSC then further on Fuji X-T.  I was getting ready to buy the X-T4 when I heard of the 5's pending release.  I waited and purchased simply because it was the latest and figured there would be no downside.  My intended use for my setup is for backpacking primarily followed by general purpose, non-pro use.  My intention was to purchase the 10-24 and 55-200 for backpacking and 16-80 as a kit lens for general purpose.  My initial impressions of the camera and 16-80mm are really favorable, I'm really pleased with the decision.  I purchased the other two on Ebay, both in apparent very good condition.  The 10-24 arrived first and I immediately loved its epic wideness.  But I immediately noticed blurriness on the right side on several frames.  Not really softness but an out of focus look despite the distances to the object in the frame being equal.  The following day, I went to the same locations and took as similar as possible photos with the 16-80 (getting focal length, f-stop, ISO as close as I could).  The result was no blurr.  So my first thought was that the lens was defective and contacted the Ebay seller.  He took it back but has since contacted me claiming the lens works fine for him on his X-T2 or 3 (can't remember).  I have no reason not to believe him, he gave me no hassle on the return.  The other used lens, the 55-200 is very sharp with no issues.  I am considering to go ahead and purchase a new 10-24 for weather sealing and a warranty.  But I am wondering if there are people here using this lens body combo and have noticed anything similar.  I don't want to wind up having similar problems with a new lens and shipping it back and forth.  Any comments or thoughts?  Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had a similar experience with my first version of the 10-24mm f/4 lens.  I saw ‘smearing’ at the edges.  Others who I knew and had the X-T5 told me that the second version, with weather sealing, performed better with their X-T5 than the original.  I purchased the newer version.  Although it is not perfect, it is much better at the edges and corners.  I am fine with it’s performance for the vast majority of my images but if I have an image where very important detail is on the edge of the frame, I’ll run the raw file through either DXO or Topaz Sharpen AI to improve the edges.  A couple of weeks ago, I published a post on my blog with my assessment and provided some example images.  If you care to read it, it can be found here:  https://www.thewanderinglensman.com/2023/01/follow-up-on-fujifilm-xf-10-24mm-lens.html.  I hope this might help you a little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2023 at 6:45 PM, SGinNorcal said:

Hello all,

I am a new Fuji user and just joined the forum.  I have a question that I don't see addressed previously, hopefully I searched correctly.

Anyway, I purchased the X-T5 in December on release.  I spent a great deal of time looking at various camera systems, settling first on APSC then further on Fuji X-T.  I was getting ready to buy the X-T4 when I heard of the 5's pending release.  I waited and purchased simply because it was the latest and figured there would be no downside.  My intended use for my setup is for backpacking primarily followed by general purpose, non-pro use.  My intention was to purchase the 10-24 and 55-200 for backpacking and 16-80 as a kit lens for general purpose.  My initial impressions of the camera and 16-80mm are really favorable, I'm really pleased with the decision.  I purchased the other two on Ebay, both in apparent very good condition.  The 10-24 arrived first and I immediately loved its epic wideness.  But I immediately noticed blurriness on the right side on several frames.  Not really softness but an out of focus look despite the distances to the object in the frame being equal.  The following day, I went to the same locations and took as similar as possible photos with the 16-80 (getting focal length, f-stop, ISO as close as I could).  The result was no blurr.  So my first thought was that the lens was defective and contacted the Ebay seller.  He took it back but has since contacted me claiming the lens works fine for him on his X-T2 or 3 (can't remember).  I have no reason not to believe him, he gave me no hassle on the return.  The other used lens, the 55-200 is very sharp with no issues.  I am considering to go ahead and purchase a new 10-24 for weather sealing and a warranty.  But I am wondering if there are people here using this lens body combo and have noticed anything similar.  I don't want to wind up having similar problems with a new lens and shipping it back and forth.  Any comments or thoughts?  Thank you in advance.

Went out today to take some photos with my XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS with the X-T5.  I don't have the latest version of that lens with WR but it performed very nicely.  I saw some light blurring in the corners at 10mm F10 but for the most part, I'm very please with the lens on the X-T5.  When I used to shoot a Canon 5D Mk II and 1Ds Mk II with their equivalent of the 10-24, I saw a lot more softness in the corners of the lens compared to the Fuji cameras I've owned (X-E1, XE2, X-T1 and X-T2)

 

 

Edited by stulevine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

I've attached a heavily cropped version of the file to show what I mean.  The left side of the shot is blurry where the left is sharp to the edges.  On left, there are things closer and further than the building on the right and both still sharp.  This was common over several photos.  So not really soft edges but a whole soft right side.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I read through Dennis's blog post and I think I'm convinced to purchase a new version of this lens.  Actually, even the original photos are better than those I was getting from the copy I was using.  If I can get similar results to those, I'll be really happy.  I love the ultra width this lens has, what epic expanses!

I really appreciate the discussion.  Have a great day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Hi Jerry, thanks so much; I already downloaded Rawtherapee v5.8. But as I am using Mac OS 12.6, probably there is some issue. There is an instruction in their website  '  Drag sh into the “Full Disk Access” pane under the “Privacy” tab in the “Security & Privacy” control panel in “Apple menu” > “System Preferences”. I tried to do but couldn't do it. So I didnt have the access to the photo folder. I already had other raw converter. Are all the data in TIFF kept as same as RAF? then I can edit it in darktable or Lightroom ( I have older version in my different laptop). 
    • My Fujifilm x100v resets the date to january 8 2000  it happens about twice a year. my personal settings rest unaffected.  I use firmware 2.13 is there a solution to this very annoying problem(bug)?    
    • Hey Guys, I am stumped. I am trying to use the Movie setting on my X-T200. I push the camera through an Elgato Cam Link so that my PC can use it. I am currently running into a problem that I turn off the Face/Eye Detection however it will still show the green box and white eye box. I still wish to use the auto focus but I do not need the Boxes present. Does anyone know a fix? Or is there a better setting I can use to allow auto-focus but remove said boxes. I am still new to cameras and do not want to go out and buy a brand new one.   Thanks.
    • Okay a quick follow up to my own post; I tried re installing the firmware on my camera, and the issue seems to have gone away (I had the latest on the camera already, but I re downloaded it and re installed it overwriting the old installation via the instructions on Fujis website). My guess is that maybe the firmware got corrupted during or sometime after my previous install. I will keep tabs on it if it starts doing it again.
    • You might give RawTherapee a try: https://rawtherapee.com Or, if you are using macOS or Windows, Fujifilm has a raw converter based on SilkyPix: https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/products/software/raw-file-converter-ex-powered-by-silkypix/ It give you some options for basic editing and touch-up for your images that you can then export as a tiff and finish in GIMP or your favorite image editor, or as jpg if that is enough.
×
×
  • Create New...