Jump to content

XF56mmF1.2 R WR Firmware update

sunsun34

By sunsun34
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Jon Phillips Newbie

Jon Phillips

Posted
Posted (edited)

@Steve Kingswell did you ever figure out how to fix your issue? I have the 56mm 1.2 and have been trying to upgrade to firmware v1.01 and I keep getting that same "Firmware not found in card slot 1" message.

I tried downloading the file to my comp and putting it onto a freshly formatted SD card via a card reader, downloading it straight onto the card, etc.. nothing seems to work. I just upgraded my 16-55 just fine, worked right away, but the 56mm I just don't get it. ¯\_(ツ)_/

Edited by Jon Phillips
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Stacy Newbie

Stacy

Posted
Posted

I have been having the same problem. I haven't been able to upgrade from 1.0. Last two upgrades gave me the same message. All other lenses updated, camera updated. I tried it over and over different ways and I cannot get the lens to update. This has also made my manual focus not work well.  

Does anyone have an answer here? FUJI can you help us???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
PatrickFuji Newbie

PatrickFuji

Posted
Posted

Here it is Oct 2023 and I'm interested in upgrading my firmware for my Fuji 56 1.2 lens.

I download the update from the Fuji site onto my SD card, put it in the camera, then get the message as above

"Firmware not found in card slot 1."

Has anyone figured out a fix for this, please and thank you.

ADDENDUM: Just discovered that this firmware update is for the 'WR' model which I don't have.  I didn't 

know there was a newer model of this lens.  So, for the 'R' model, there doesn't seem to be an update for firmware 

from v1.00.

Thank you,Patrick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...