Jump to content

Star/Astro shots - 50sii vs 100s?

Recommended Posts


I am pondering a move to medium format.  One driver for me is to be able to get better star shots.  I am thinking the bigger sensor will help a fair amount.  The question I have is which is then more important once you have a bigger sensor (aka 100s and 50sii are same physical size) - the higher megapixels to catch more detail (100s) or larger photo receptor sites on the lower megapixel sensor (50sii).

My hunch is the 50sii.....but its more hunch than informed by experience with these bodies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Between the two, the 50 will probably be a better choice for stars in the night sky, but, …, well that may not be your best approach according to folks that discuss those issues:



I think if you enjoy the hobby and want to use your camera for the images by all means give it a try.

But do keep in mind that you will need a g mount to telescope (t mount) adapter instead of the easier to find x mount to telescope adapter. Also, be aware that most popular telescopes use a two inch (M48) focuser — and associated other gear. This is ideal for APS-C sized sensors, but causes vignetting for full frame sensors and will not send an image outside the two inch circle to large frame sensors — you get an inner image with vignetting to black rectangle framing. This is not impossible to deal with, replace the focuser with one more appropriate but expensive especially after you make similar changes to any other gear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I am a total hack.  My thought would be to first get the kit 35-70 with an eye on the 20-35 as a more appropriate use case (wider, very marginally faster).  I don't plan to start hooking up my telescope to anything given the massive number of permutations and combinations to consider (not to mention the size/weigth and the fact i can't travel with it).

I am willing to learn some new tricks on stacking.  I would be interested in maybe a very small 'tracker' but I don't plan to start hooking up actual telescopes to the body.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trackers such as Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Pro and iOptron SkyGuider Pro are quite popular. As long as you can keep the total weight (camera, lens, etc.) under 11 pounds (about 5 kilograms) these should work. These are Alt-Az types of mounts, often used for star photos as opposed to the German Equatorial Mounts more typically used for deep sky objects. Note: Depending on where you purchase one of these, the tripod may or may not be included, also make certain the counter weight is included. Resellers often put together different packages designed to inflict as much wallet damage as possible.

For stacking, there are a lot of free and paid options out there, ASTAP, Siril, Deep Sky Stacker, APT, Pix Insight are all easy to find. Affinity Photo has an built-in astrophotography stacking module. I do not think GIMP or PhotoShop have that yet, but I do not know for certain.

Show us some photos when you can.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • You do have some options. If you want to use Apple’s Photos to take care of storing, managing the files and lightweight editing but want to also use an raw converter / editor with more “oomph”, you can do that as well: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102259 scroll down to the part about “Install Mac apps …”. Affinity Photo comes to mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2Zt1NDfC7E https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ DarkTable, a raw convertor also has a dam built into it, you might like it. This program has a steeper learning curve than Photos does, but it is very powerful: https://www.darktable.org If you are inclined to do a little more asset management yourself, RawTherapee or Fujifilm’s Raw Converter are pretty good: https://rawtherapee.com https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/products/software/raw-file-converter-ex-powered-by-silkypix/ p.s. Welcome to the forum.
    • If you are using a Mac have you tried Photos?  You would have to use uncompressed raw for Apple support. I wouldn't say its the best raw processor for Fuji - but it comes for free with the Mac and it works as a DAM.
    • Hello,  This past weekend I shot a weekend-long event. I took the X-H2S and the X-T30II as a back up to the X-H2S. The latter never failed me once, even with the brutal heat (though I got the overheating warning literally in the last 15 seconds of the last day of shooting). One problem I did have is that I wasn't expecting to have such a flurry of events, so in documentary/press-style I had to shoot very fast in rapid succession at times at night. My Godox (which I am starting to hate) did fail me. The recycle time was hit or miss, sometimes fast sometimes up to 5 seconds. I changed batteries twice, yet I got the overheating warning a few times and had to turn it off and on. Eventually I took out the X-T30II and used the back up flash.  I am guessing for these evening events, I'll probably need to opt for a lithium battery-operated flash in the future/different brand. Does anyone have a recommendation? I don't usually shoot with flash, or at least I haven't since my Nikon DSLR days. 
    • i don't have my x-t5 yet, but what I do with timecode challenged cameras is record 10 seconds of timecode audio on the front of the recording from a tentacle using the microphone.  Davinci Resolve can read the first bit of video file and set the clip's timecode.  Worst case, use Tentacle studio to give you the timecode to adjust the clip's timecode by hand.
    • I tried to use the "Introduce Yourself" option but it won't open. Obviously I'm new. I'm Linda. A friend sent me his Fujifilm X-E4 camera to use as a travel camera. I've just started using it and really am enjoying the feel of it and learning how to use the system.  I understand by reading some posts that folks like to use Capture One. I'm retired and on a fixed income. It's not even close to possible for me to pay those monthly fees. I'm an old Aperture junkie hoping to find a DAM that's so easy and clear to use. Is that possible?  thanks for your time  
  • Create New...