Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just a question about firmware. I believe technically there is not much difference between the X-A1 and X-A2, in terms of hardware (other then the screen). As such would it be possible for the X-A2 firmware to be installed on the X-A1? 

 

A hacker somebody who knows code probably could without too much trouble, theoretically. But until then, we can not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I am new to this forum and had just sold my Ricoh GR.

In the past, I have always choose camera with built-in viewfinder, for the GR, I use an optical finder as a make shift.

Having owned before X100, X100S etc, I am a bit tired of its size.  GR was fine but somehow, the focus speed and the color - personally not to my liking, not to mention that WB.

As I researched further, I am interested in the X70.  Since I already owned a XT1, I am kind of narrowed my interest between XM-1, XA1 and XA2 as a take-everywhere camera.  Am I right to assume the following: 

1. XM1 and XA1/2 has different sensor, one with AA filter and one without?

2. X-A1 and X-A2 has not much difference except the screen on latter can be tilted upwards?  Anything else that is different between the two?

Thanks for all the feedback

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 yes

 

2 yes, no

 

Buying the X-A1 gives you the same camera with the sole exception of the LCD screen.

 

Personally I wouldn’t be interested in selfies. In my part of the world the first model can be found very cheap secondhand.

 

Having said that. While the X-A certainly gives you the possibility to familiarize yourself with the fuji camera system, is not in the same category of other cameras.

 

You can buy a X-E1 new or secondhand for very little money and have a camera with a viewfinder, which you will discover it will help you not only when there is a lot of sunlight but also  to hold the camera differently with a consequent higher image stability.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other difference between X-A1 and X-A2 is not in th camera, but in the lens kits

 

If you can stil pick up a retail X-A1 it is shipped with 1st generation XC 16-50 (and in some cases, XC -50-230), where the X-A2 is supplied with 2nd generation versions

 

I do not believe there is an optical difference (not that I have tested both revisions)

 

From what I have read the 2nd revision has better OIS, and closer focusing, i'm sure others can confirm this.

 

 

Also on Fuji uk website for X-A2 also quotes a longer battery life, and eye detection (among other focus improvements), face detection was present on X-A1 but tbh i don't know about eye and can't check atm 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beg to differ.

 

The camera is different, you cannot tilt the EVF towards the subject in the first model. The XA2 is specifically marketed as a “ selfie” camera.

 

The lenses have minor differences in the OIS and minimum focussing of only the 16-50 ( but these are not necessarily sold with the camera)

 

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_a2/

 

” The FUJIFILM X-A2 is the first X Series model to feature an LCD screen that flips up 175 degrees making it easier to take a selfie. "

 

@

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...