Jump to content

Anyone using the x-pro 2 and 27mm?


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am looking at sellingmy X100T and grabbing the X-pro2 and 27mm (primarily for its compact size) - does anyone have any experience with this combo? 

If so, how is the AF speed? if you also have the new 35mm WR how do the two compare?

 

Any advice much appreciated  

Thanks :)

Edited by lhotse
Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-Pro2 is my first Fuji camera, and I was determined to start with the 27mm, because I was hooked on the Panasonic 20mm and its unique field of view when I was still using a Pen M4/3 camera. However, after watching hundreds of images from the 27mm, I recognised the one thing that I dislike about the Pana 20mm ... a bokeh with an unpleasing kind of blur. It looks shaky, artificial and plain ugly at times. I found that phenomenon in the XF27mm too many times to my liking and decided to go for the 35mm WR. The latter is a wonderful piece of glass and does render out-of-focus image areas more beautifully, but I do miss the 40mm (35mm equiv.) field of view. I was hoping that Fuji would take the 27mm more seriously, but that won't be happening any time soon I'm afraid. In my opinion it offers the most perfect angle of view (between the wide 23mm and the narrow 35mm), and I still may buy it after all, despite the nature of its bokeh. I wonder if the shaky bokeh (d)effect is typical for lens designs used for pancakes, or is it a coincidence that both the Pana 20mm and the XF-27mm share this signature?

 

The AF with the X-Pro2 seemed to be very accurate and fast. At least there wasn't a noticeable difference with the 35mm WR. I haven't tested all possible situations of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lhotse,

 

I'm using the X-Pro 2 and the 27mm.

In my opinion the 27mm is a brilliant lens and its certainly compact/lightweight. That said I'd keep your X100T for now and wait for the X100T successor. Because if compact is what you want then the X100T successor will be smaller/lighter and just as good as the Xpro2 with the 27 mm on the front.

 

Brgds

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Have you tried a firmware update? It should not be needed but since it will reset most everything when you run it it is worth a try (and harmless)

 

I believe there is a lens update as well that ties in with the XP2 update that improved focus.

 

It's a great little lens, the field is not 100% flat but that has not been a problem however it is sensitive to cross light and it doesn't have a hood which is a faux-pas at the price.I made a cheap felt tube that fits the barrel - it works when I remember it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have an x-pro2 with 27mm (and 18-55mm and 56mm 1.2). The autofocus is not very fast and maybe a bit too noisy (this seems to me the real problem) but the lens is wonderful for its great performance and its small size. It's the ideal lens for street photography .... I find it a very high quality lens that's just a bit weak in the backlight, but it's a "must have" with the x-pro2. The bokeh? I bought the 56mm 1.2 for the excellent bokeh, from 27mm I expect "good performance and low profile" ... Exactly what it offers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...