Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello guys, I've a question and I really appreciate if you could help me.

I've a Fuji XT4 and i normally use Eterna film simulation in the lowest ISO possible. The question is, now I have a project and i wanna shoot in F-Log, i know you can't go below 640 ISO because supposedly is Fuji native ISO. But i did some tests and Flog at 640 ISO and has a lot more noise compared with Eterna at 160 ISO.

I've tested with -4 NR and 0 NR and still, the FLog has a lot more noise compared with eterna or every other simu. at 160 ISO.

What i'm doing wrong?

Note: You can only see that difference when the video is running, i've tried in Premiere, DaVinci and even did an export and transfer it to iphone and yes, is noticeable.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Flog2 requires some noise reduction.  Zebras need to be set to 85.  Expose clip to 1/3 stop less than when zebras appear.  I use Davinci Resolve Studio Noise Reduction.  Temporal noise reduction set to the following: Frames = 5, Motion Estimation Type = Faster, Motion Range = Medium, Luma/Chroma = 5 is great starting point and usually works well.  You can refine the amount of noise reduction by looking at the waveform.  Adjust Luma/Chroma up and down until waveform does not change.

To the fairest,

Eris

Edited by Don Barar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,
I've sold my fuji xt4 and bought the XH2S and i've been learning how to use Flog 2 properly.
Yes Flog 2 has a lot of noise involved, so make sure before recording something if you need that amount of dynamic range in your videos. If not, Flog 640 has plenty of DR.
If you expose FLOG 2 incorrectly the shadows and blacks will suffer, A LOT!
What i think makes people confused is thinking that you must expose LOG profiles as the other "normal" color profiles, meaning, it's always better to underexpose than over expose. Wrong. When using LOG profiles it's always better to over expose. A little bit like film.
Use your light meter and expose everything at least 1 stop over (i find 1.5 being the sweet spot). I don't use zebras, but dont expect miracles when you have a hi contrast scenes, even the best cameras will suffer.

About the noise that's really subjective, if you want a super corporate clean look yeah maybe you need to use NR, but the noise in FLOG 2 is really beautiful not that kind of color noise you find in other cameras. I never use NR in artistic projects, again, i find the noise in Flog very filmic. But to summarize, over expose FLOG 2 always!

And P.S. i do agree that Fuji could lower the base iso for FLOG2

Edited by P_eterna11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the forum. Hopefully, these may help: https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/stories/advanced-month-5-focusing-20-focus-bracketing/ https://youtu.be/gouqhCSVdAY  
    • Just reading the great advice shared here. I would probably say that pw-pix resonates most with me for the size, quality and low light ability. I haven’t used the 70-300 as I have other needs, but if you watch Andy Mumford, one of the few YouTubers I watch, he seems to like it. Hope this helps. 
    • I used this lens a little on the xh2 and xh2s and more recently on an xt5. I saw the new one today when I was picking up a loan lens and whilst it is definitely lighter in my hand and I am told might be slightly better optically, I wouldn’t dream of changing. The first one is great and meets my varied needs but like anything else, it’s entirely up to you. Personally I tend to ignore the influencers. No disrespect, but they’re just not for me. Also some people don’t like the xh2 design so you might want to consider that before moving from xt. Personally I’m happy with both xh and xt bodies. I haven’t had the pleasure of an xt4 but I understand it’s a great camera. I suppose it depends on what you want to do with it. Hope this helps a little. Ultimately it’s your money and your choice. 
    • Those answers are stupid AI, this is the weirdest forum ever. There isn't an "issue", the lens is fully functional. Fuji are just saying that they don't believe the lens fully resolves the 40mp sensor. It will still look better on the 40mp sensor than it did on the previous sensors.
    • Hey Pedro !    so I just bought the cable you posted above and weirdly - with my GFX50S the angle (when inserted) is exactly like the OP ! … UP ! can you confirm which way your port faces ? thanks Tim
×
×
  • Create New...