Jump to content

X-H2s AF-C hunting on certain older lenses


Recommended Posts

Hello! I bought an X-H2s recently and have had AF-C problems with the XF 16-55 f2.8 R LM WR and the XF 56 1.2 R. The 56mm was already noisily hunting with my older X-bodies, but this seems to have drastically increased with the X-H2s. It is as if the autofocus is too active for it, which is something I can understand with this camera which seems to be on steroids, but this shouldn't be happening with the 16-55, right? 

Is anyone else experiencing this? I would be really thankful for any feedback.

Edited by Admill
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Admill said:

Hello! I bought an X-H2s recently and have had AF-C problems with the XF 16-55 f2.8 R LM WR and the XF 56 1.2 R. The 56mm was already noisily hunting with my older X-bodies, but this seems to have drastically increased with the X-H2s. It is as if the autofocus is too active for it, which is something I can understand with this camera which seems to be on steroids, but this shouldn't be happening with the 16-55, right? 

Is anyone else experiencing this? I would be really thankful for any feedback.

Can you test another 16-55 lens with this new body?

When new stuff is released, there usually are some things that go awry. If all of those same lenses have troubles, vs. just isolated instances of problems, then perhaps the overall issue can be addressed. These are, as one person put it after all, specialized computers attached to lenses, so upgrades to the body can cause the attachments to act strangely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cpX said:

Fujifilm could provide a firmware update for the digital camera and lenses. But for my X-A1 I didn't get a new firmware update either. Maybe it's time to test another digital camera system...

The X-A1 was announced in 2013, launched in 2014 and discontinued in 2016. How long would you expect updates for a discontinued product?

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, cpX said:

As long as the digital camera does not work with a new lens. Would be quite a waste of garbage if you can throw away the digital cameras every 3 years because there is no more support. That would not be exactly sustainable and certainly not intended for the future.

You have tangled two different ideas into one, that one having little to do with the problem facing the original poster.

How about moving the rant to a different thread so the original issue can be addressed toward / for the person asking for help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jerryy said:

Can you test another 16-55 lens with this new body?

When new stuff is released, there usually are some things that go awry. If all of those same lenses have troubles, vs. just isolated instances of problems, then perhaps the overall issue can be addressed. These are, as one person put it after all, specialized computers attached to lenses, so upgrades to the body can cause the attachments to act strangely.

Thank you for your reply, much appreciated. Unfortunately I don't know where I could get another copy of this lens without buying it again.

It is as if the lens focuses a bit in front of the subject sometimes. It is possible that I already had this problem with the X-T4, but that the camera focused much slower and therefore the effect was not as pronounced. I photograph dancers in low lighting conditions, which is hard for the autofocus of any make of camera (even full frame) to handle. The X-T4 is just so quiet and perfect for taking photos during live performances, but now with the fast sensor speed of the X-H2s, complete silent images are possible! It is like you say, this is a computer, but now on steroids.

My 50-140mm, 33mm f/1.4 and 90mm f/2 are all loving this new body. But the 56mm is now feeling like a rusted piece of squeaking machinery. Just wish that someone on here has had a similar experience with the 16-55 (well I don't really wish that upon anybody) and has a solution. Or maybe Fujifilm will release another firmware update soon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Admill said:

Thank you for your reply, much appreciated. Unfortunately I don't know where I could get another copy of this lens without buying it again.

Hmm, how do these lens react using AF-S mode?

If they are also grindingly slow in this mode that would be more evidence toward a resolution. If they respond fast enough, you may be able to use them until a better solution happens. That depends on your reflexes as well, being able to click the shutter button quickly to get the shot, or use the old, old method from before good AF came along of pre-focusing on a region, wait for the subject to arrive there, then snapping the shot — the AF would work okay in that short of a distance. Basically, until more is known, using the body’s faster speed in your favor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jerryy said:

Hmm, how do these lens react using AF-S mode?

If they are also grindingly slow in this mode that would be more evidence toward a resolution. If they respond fast enough, you may be able to use them until a better solution happens. That depends on your reflexes as well, being able to click the shutter button quickly to get the shot, or use the old, old method from before good AF came along of pre-focusing on a region, wait for the subject to arrive there, then snapping the shot — the AF would work okay in that short of a distance. Basically, until more is known, using the body’s faster speed in your favor.

That's a good idea, thanks. I do think that the AF-S works pretty well, will have a test to make sure. At least that could make it possible for me to still use these lenses for now, because they are really showing their age on this new body.

Glad that there is a new 56mm coming out. I just realised that the 16-55 costs about the same as a Fuji prime lens... there has to be some sort of compromise in IQ or autofocus capability to justify this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...