Fujifilm currently focusing on development of compact WR lenses instead of XF33mmF1.0! Smart Move? Vote the POLL!
-
Posts
-
I have the XT5, have been using the XF 33mm f1.4 and prior to this the XF 18-55 and have had this message appearing from time to time but then it started appearing more often. I finally took it to Fujifilm and they gave me this ridiculous diagnosis that the camera was exposed to liquid and that I needed to pay around 300 euros for repair. Needless to say that I have been taking good care of my camera and it was never in contact with any liquid. -
By RoaringLense · Posted
I love my X70. Are there any good sites with active conversations about this camera? I’m going to be using it a lot more over the holiday. -
By PoorAlchemist · Posted
Hi, I downloaded a LUT pack from here: https://www.fujifilm-x.com/fr-fr/support/download/lut/ But the LUTs don’t work at all in DaVinci Resolve. When I apply them to a node, absolutely nothing happens. Does it work for you? Thanks. P.S.: Why is there no Provia LUT? -
Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…
Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!
-
By thelostkiwi · Posted
More testing of lenses today. Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode. Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode. If weight is an issue for you the kit 35-70 Fuji GFX lens is lightweight and better than you might expect but isn't a fast lens at f/4.5-5.6
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now