Jump to content

Combination of MCEX16, TC1.4 and 90mm f2


uckdie

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking, if a combination of the MCEX16, the TC 1.4 and the 90mm would be usefull as a macro.

 

I know that the TC will not fit the 90mm. Don't try it, it could damage the lens. With an MCEX16 inbetween it is a different story, though:

 

25613284143_c300eed033_z.jpgMCEX16 and TC1,4 combined

 

This is a sample of only the 90mm at shortest focus distance:

 

25943082420_e6ccc9c675_z.jpg90mm by Cruiser223, on Flickr

 

Now let's see a shot with the MCEX 16:

 

26123500432_0501f6c5d5_z.jpg90mm plus MCEX16

 

And finally 90mm, MECEX16, TC1,4:

 

26190059996_6157d0dd48_z.jpg90mm, MCEX16 and TC1,4

 

I like the result. What do you think? The magnification should be 0.4 with the MCEX 16mm and 0,56 when adding the TC. It should probably work with other Fuji lenses as well.

 

Regards, Dieter

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, it's not that bad at all, since the 90 is already one of the sharpest lens we have currently the extra macro tube and TC doesn't seems to be impacting the performances too much.

 

Did you adjusted the loss of light in post or are all these SOOC Jpegs ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pics are SOOC. All shot at f8 and ISO3200 on a tripod. It was a quick test in remaining daylight. I did move the cactus and changed the angle of the camera to position the cactus in the picture. No post processing. AF was on the "white dot." In the EXIF you will see that the timing went down from 1/50s to 1/25s with MCEX and TC. I will probably do some more examples next weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad at all.

I had the same idea with MCEX and TC, it obviously enough, but unfortunately I don't have neither tube nor TC, so didn't tried it. lol. 

Did you have only one MCEX tube? May be 16+11+TC also is a working combo...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad at all.

I had the same idea with MCEX and TC, it obviously enough, but unfortunately I don't have neither tube nor TC, so didn't tried it. lol. 

Did you have only one MCEX tube? May be 16+11+TC also is a working combo...

Yes, I only have 16mm MCEX tube.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So I ran into this thread while looking for samples of the 90mm with the MCEX-16 extension.  The 1.4 TC is just icing on the cake.  Thanks for the comparisons.  But seeing the price of the 1.4 TC it's almost better to just buy a manual macro lens with true 1:1 magnification it seems.  Bummer, I was hoping for a all Fujifilm solution.  Was really looking forward to the 120 f2.8 macro till Fuji dropped it :(.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...