Jump to content

Let’s Drop The RUMOR-BOMB: Fujifilm is forging a MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA (Source Right in Past)


Recommended Posts

I like this idea.  Just because they are exploring MF doesn't mean they are leaving the APS behind.  This opens up a whole new market for them and with the success of the new MFs that have been coming out, it's a good direction for them to explore.

 

I personally don't see how high megapixel full frames are competing with MF, so I don't get that whole argument myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really should not take Red G8R's comment out of context. They stated why they are not interested at all, and its quite reasonable.   

 

"Not interested at all. I came to Fuji because I wanted a small quality camera. I still have my FF Nikons so for me MF is out of the question."

 

I'm not sure how this reasoning makes them the minority. Many of us are here for the exact same reason.   Do you own a MF digital camera now? If not, why is that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very excited if Fuji followed their own playbook from APS-C and started with a MF fixed lens rangefinder, and then go to a mirrorless MF system from there.

 

I imagine Fuji building a MF X100 by using Sony's popular CMOS 50mp 33x44 sensor and a fast 35mm equivalent lens in front of it (a 45mm f/2.8 would be great). There would be no reason for that camera to be huge: the Sony is a "crop-MF" sensor and is therefore smaller than a 645 negative, there's no film spools and there's no restriction on where to place the viewfinder as a result of the path of the film. Also, a thought for those that have shot MF film: a 645 rangefinder could have a horizontal viewfinder---hurray!! 

 

My guess is that if Fuji can build such a camera profitably for under $5,000 they will find enough buyers to make it worth their while. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My guess is that if Fuji can build such a camera profitably for under $5,000 they will find enough buyers to make it worth their while. 

As I said earlier, Fuji is not Sony.  IMHO, they will not compete based on price on high end equipment.   If the cheapest competitor is selling camera for $8k for the body, its more likely based on their past history with X introduction, will sell theirs for $10k or higher like the PhaseOne. 

If you disagree, why do you believe Fuji is motivated to sell for $3k less than the Pentax?  Is there anything that leads you to believe that Fuji is motivated to undercut anyone on price based on APS-C form factor "X" or 2/3  "X" sensor relative to Pentax or any other competitors?  I'm surprised by your response. Help me understand your logic.  Its there something you have seen which leads you to believe the Fuji will act differently in respect to price in medium format than what they have traditional done in  2/3 compact, APC-S mirrorless or the Fuji DX DSLR bodies?    Pentax will show them the door if they try to compete with them on price IMHO.  In the same way Sony would if they tried to do that on 2/3 compact, APC-S mirrorless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be all over the MF in a second. Of course, price is the ultimate factor, but it would be a good reason to dump most of my current (non-fuji related) gear. 

The question, which has been discussed before, is would the current lens line-up somehow be used? If so double win. 

I don't think the XF/XC lenses could be made to work. In theory they're designed to cover an APS-C sensor (29mm diagonal). Some people believe certain XF lenses actually cover full frame (42mm diagonal) but I can't imagine that they cover "crop 645" (55mm diagonal) or 645 (70mm diagonal). 645 has *six* times the surface area of APS-C!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you disagree, why do you believe Fuji is motivated to sell for $3k less than the Pentax?

I don't disagree. I wrote the following: "My guess is that _IF_ Fuji can build such a camera profitably for under $5,000 they will find enough buyers to make it worth their while". I did not express an opinion as to what they WILL charge for it if they build it. That's your area of expertise ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't disagree. I wrote the following: "My guess is that _IF_ Fuji can build such a camera profitably for under $5,000 they will find enough buyers to make it worth their while". I did not express an opinion as to what they WILL charge for it if they build it. That's your area of expertise ;-)

ah.. thanks. btw, you are too kind, but I am no expert.. just an observer.  I'd don't even own an MF camera.

 Just trying to understand your opinion of why they would ever try to enter the MF market with a camera that undercuts the lowest competitor in that market by $3000. Its counter to past behavior.  Perhaps you knew something that I did not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I many shooters would love to see Fuji develop a digital MF system based on their digital rangefinder-esque design. A body and a few primes would be lusted after by editorial and portrait shooters as well as many others. If true, I hope we see a leaf shutter lenses. The Pentax 645z has already demonstrated the high ISO capabilities so X-Trans on Sony's 44x33mm sensor would just be amazing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea if a Fujifilm medium format revival on digital. They made one of the best affordable MF on film.

 

My imagination is running a bit.....x-trans3, 40mpix.... great for studio and perhaps, dare I suggest landscape? After all, it is smaller than other MF cameras.....if the 6 x 9 is anything to go by.... probably priced below $4-5k. Tempting proposition....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given fujis history of different frame sizes on film, its no surprice they are looking into mf digital.

 

The big news would be if its for their organic sensor project. If that technology is mature enough they will have a sensor tech where price is more or less linear to the size (area). In that case, we may see a gf670-like camera or even a digital backnsize 6x8.

 

If not, sensor price rises exponentially compared to size and a cropped 645 sensor is the most probable target. The specs would then be something like the gw645(w).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely want a medium format body, but It should also cost less than $5,000.

I know that's asking too much right now, but the first model should aim for $8,000 and work down.

Remember that a sub $2,000 full frame body was inconceivable not very long ago.

 

And here's hoping they give us at least an IMAX size sensor, these puny imposter "medium format" bodeis floating around aren't giving Medium Format a proper image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What this really means is that, if true, Fuji are serious about once again being a player in the professional market. They lost their way for a while with consumer compacts and bridge cameras and started their comeback with the X100.

 

I really think this is good news for serious and professional users of Fuji equipment, even for those who don't actually want or need medium format.

 

Now, that serious dedicated, professional calibre flash….?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to see a MF 50+ MP digital rangefinder-esque offering from Fuji.  One that was equally suited to shooting in the field (quick, intuitive handling, relatively high frame rate) and with strobes/studio lighting (large informative screen, ability to tether/wifi, lenses w/ leaf shutters).  

 

If it could shoot 480fps 4K raw video, too, that would be great.  Thanks Fuji!  For testing, send the prototype to K. Kielinski, Philadelphia, PA  USA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made this illustration just as a food for thought. Keep in mind that "medium format" nowadays means "anything bigger than 24x36 mm".

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

PS: No, I'm not dreaming of DLF, that would cost like a private island. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's only one way to make a humanly affordable 6x7 digital camera: scanning sensor. And I seriously doubt that anyone would want to revert to that ancient technology in 2015.

 

Indeed the rolling shutter problem is terrible. -_-

 

And somebody already did make that 8 x 10 " sensor. :o

http://petapixel.com/2011/08/25/photographer-makes-his-own-8x10-digital-back-for-the-price-of-a-house/

 

8x10digital.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Looking more like the next Fuji camera we see will be an X-T50 but it is still a rumor and no specs have been published.
    • Hey guys, The shutter on/off button switch may be loose on mine. After turning camera on and pressing the shutter/holding close to the area, the camera will turn off and say 'sensor cleaning'. This doesn't happen if I'm shooting via touch screen at all. Everything else is functional. Anyone else experience this before? Would love a much cheaper fix since Fuji Canada just quoted me $700 CAD to fix it, and considering everything else is functional except that part I'm not even sure why MPMB Main Board parts is being replaced😕 I got no explanation from them either.
    • As far as I know the firmware is not country specific. Are you sure that the filename has not been changed ( I am told this can happen with mac os). That's the only thing I can think of.
    • My x-t5 does not exhibit the focusing switch behaviour as you report it, so that is very strange and indicative of a fault. It does not matter whether the flash is attached or not. Once you set the camera for your studio flash, say 1/250th at f5.6, the camera, which is showing you what you will get at that exposure without the flash, will show a black screen unless the ambient light is brighter than what you would typically get indoors. That is why, as Jerry says, you have to set preview exp/wb to off. I have set a button for this.
    • I connected to FRAME.IO a while back and it works fine, but the camera wouldn't connect to the internet all of a sudden today and would get stuck on the reset screen, including initializing and even switching USB Connection mode. Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
×
×
  • Create New...