Jump to content

New To Fuji XT-10 For Weddings


rollsman4

Recommended Posts

  Just got the XT-10 and Fuji 16-55 F2.8.  I am using Sony A7ii but have a strong interest in the Fuji system.  I like everything about it BUT the Q button I keep hitting with my right hand. Any suggestions? Also, Did I choose the the Best System for shooting weddings?  I appreciate any suggestions. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't shoot weddings, but I have both a Sony A7r and an X-T10.

 

Never had a problem with the Q button, but the handling of the camera improved greatly by adding an L-bracket thanks to its additional grip/handle (10$ on ebay).

 

Like I said I don't shoot weddings, but contrarily to what the Internet seems to think I was never favorably impressed with Sony high ISOs performance. Above 800/1600iso (and in long exposures) all the Sony I ever had, included the A7r, put out hundreds of hot pixels that are a pain to get rid off (with or without the noise reduction on). This if you actually use the high ISOs in low light situations, instead of in fairly brightly illuminated scenes like in many of the online tests.

 

The Fuji images instead, while a tiny tad more grainy if compared to Sony's files downscaled to 16Mp, are remarkably clean and seem to respond much better to luminance noise reduction, and to almost not need at all color noise reduction.

 

Last thing, Fuji focus peaking is bang on precise, while Sony's is always way off to be really useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome.

 

BTW, in my opinion (and in the way I use them) Sony cameras excel for landscape & studio, basically "tripod use", while Fuji (and to a lesser extent Olympus) are better tools for handheld shots.

 

In a practical sense, Sony replaced my medium (6x7) and large format (5x7") setups, while Fuji and a small (especially in terms of lenses' size) Olympus have replaced my 4.5x6 medium format and 35mm film setups. As they say horses for courses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest thiswayup

If the q button is really a problem, you could trying adding some protection using Sugru. Its most common use with a camera is adding grip, but there's no reason you can't use it to shield the Q button from whatever angle you are hitting it from:

 

https://sugru.com/blog/6-sugru-ideas-for-photographers

 

a2l's advice sounds good to me; I add the type of grip I think he's talking about to every camera when possible now. They handle well and the fast tripod attachement using arca is nice:

 

http://www.amazon.com/Fotga-External-Bracket-Fujifilm-Camera/dp/B013UH24PI

Edited by thiswayup
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...