Jump to content

Help/advice about Fujinon 90mm


Giorgos Korakis

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

A few days ago purchased the Fujinon 90mm f2; looks a very nice piece of glass as documented.

However, today during my first serious acquaintance with the lens I see that as the lens is tilting front to back something inside is respectively dangling freely back-forth. It is located about a bit front of the center of the lens barrel the movement is of several mm and makes a gentle/low bumping noise. I can see the move through the lens glass and looks like it is a lens element because the magnification of the opening circle (the diameter) when moving slightly changes.

When I mount the lens on the XT-1 it keeps doing the same dangling when camera is OFF, BUT when the camera is turned ON it stops and from this moment nothing is moving. It is solid. The lens AF works OK.

 

I think this is not normal, even though the lens seems to work now (but do not know how long it will last).  So I would appreciate any piece of advice could get on this situation. Unfortunately the lens was not purchased from a store near to me but a relatively big European e-shop through mail.

 

Best regards,

 

Giorgos

Edited by Giorgos Korakis
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, mine does exactly the same. I suspect it is part of the focusing mechanism. I have had other lenses (Nikon) doing something similar, so I'm not worried.

 

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

 

 

SewellDK, thanks for the input. 

 

Sounds strange so much wobbling ( I own 3 other Fujinons and are rock solid) but it is OK. Just found a good description of this here: http://admiringlight.com/blog/review-fujifilm-fujinon-xf-90mm-f2-r-lm-wr/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, @darknj, you aren’t seeing double. This has already being discussed at least once.

 

 http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/730-xf-90mm-lens-elements-rattling/

 

 

Although there is no compulsion on this board to do so and the management doesn’t even frown upon opening a thread for one picture only, checking the search function before opening threads might be a good idea, simply to keep information relevant and at hand.

 

If this is diluted among many threads it becomes more difficult for all to access all of the collective wisdom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't this already discussed on previous thread about that lens ? Or am I have a some weird form of "déjà vu" ?

 

apologies for having arrived belated, however the need for some immediate/direct advice does not imply particular wish for a discussion; do not confuse them

Edited by Giorgos Korakis
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, @darknj, you aren’t seeing double. This has already being discussed at least once.

 

 http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/730-xf-90mm-lens-elements-rattling/

 

 

Although there is no compulsion on this board to do so and the management doesn’t even frown upon opening a thread for one picture only, checking the search function before opening threads might be a good idea, simply to keep information relevant and at hand.

 

If this is diluted among many threads it becomes more difficult for all to access all of the collective wisdom.

 

 

Milandro, thanks for the link. There's been some debate around this issue in the net including other brands using same technology too.

 

Search function is a fine idea in most cases (especially when you have the time and calmness...).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t suppose that writing on a forum is an activity done in a hurry  ;) anyway, many on all manners of sites do that of starting threads without checking whether there is one not another thread on any particular matter, the reasons are various and I am not going to say that one does anything wrong because this forum doesn’t have anything in the rules saying that you shouldn’t.

 

It’s only a matter of common sense to not spread information thin among every time a new thread. Even if you are not the initiator of any thread, your post will be seen, not only: the people whom had been answering before will probably be alerted ( I have an automatic alert to any thread I have partaken). and you have more chance to get a response that way than otherwise. 

 

Good luck!

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

apologies for having arrived belated, however the need for some immediate/direct advice does not imply particular wish for a discussion; do not confuse them

 

Oh no worries at all ! It was just something on my side, I wasn't certain if it was related to the same lens or if it was about another lens.

 

But yeah, whatever was said about it already :]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Buttons Fn1 and Q stopped working
    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Hi everyone I have a problem while using my xpro3 and strobes, from a day to an other I started to have a black shade on the side of my ID photos so it's kind of problematic. It's like if the speed is to high except it happened even at 1/30s. And the shutter speed seems accurate with ambiant light so I'm a bit disturbed about all of this.   Anyone has an idea about that case ?
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
×
×
  • Create New...