Jump to content

xt-30. programmed for 'raw only' coming out as jpg in capture one. Hints to rectify are welcome.


Scooter47

Recommended Posts

You're going to have to give us some more information. What do you mean by "upload from card" and "show as jpgs"?

If you are using a computer and copy the RAF files (using a card reader) from card to computer and then access those files with a program that can read Fujifilm raw files (such as Lightroom) then the image you see will be converted from  raw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Greybeard said:

You're going to have to give us some more information. What do you mean by "upload from card" and "show as jpgs"?

If you are using a computer and copy the RAF files (using a card reader) from card to computer and then access those files with a program that can read Fujifilm raw files (such as Lightroom) then the image you see will be converted from  raw.

Ignore this comment - the forum wouldn't let me edit or delete it - I missed the key part of your heading when you mentioned Capture One.

Did you shoot raw+jpg maybe and load the jpg into Capture One?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, I’m no expert so apologies if this is nonsense 🙂

Are they definitely jpgs?  It might be that C1 is showing you the preview of the raw file that reflects the camera settings?

Eg, you shot using B&W film sim.  You saved in raw but the preview shows that film sim applied.  If you go to the colour tab (IIRC) you can change the profile?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...