Jump to content

Which Fuji X cameras do you use?


FX Admin

Which Fuji X cameras do you use?  

816 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Fuji X cameras do you use?

    • Fuji X-Pro1
      147
    • Fuji X-Pro2
      96
    • Fuji X-T1
      411
    • Fuji X-T10
      110
    • Fuji X-E1
      105
    • Fuji X-E2
      179
    • Fuji X-E2s
      14
    • Fuji X-A1
      17
    • Fuji X-A2
      3
    • Fuji X-M1
      32
    • Fuji X100
      49
    • Fuji X100s
      87
    • Fuji X100t
      105
    • Fuji X70
      12
    • Fuji X10 / X20 / X30
      60
    • Fuji X-S1
      15
    • Fuji XF1
      7
    • Fuji XQ1/XQ2
      10

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

X-T1, X-Pro1, X-E1

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

To avoid GAS, I converted my X-E1 to Infrared, and gave it an active second live (see pictures).

Would it be possible to add a possibility to the list to choose IR-converted?
 
Greets,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

X-T1 and X100T most time.

Reactivated the X-E2 with FW4 as my X-T1 backup.

Two X-Pro1 bodies. Old ladies - but love them.

Somewhere is a X-M1 around. Too cheap to sell.

And of course the great tiny X-Q2.

 

Waiting for the X-Pro2 and the other 24MP cameras to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

X100 , E-1, and just acquired PRO2

 

Love all my cameras. The PRO2 focusing is damn accurate and very fast. Love the colors too - they seems more solid & richer.  It was worth the price.

So far have only tried the 35mm/1.4 on the PRO2

56mm and 14mm are next.

Edited by ShutterNot
Link to post
Share on other sites

X-T1. By the end of the year I might change. If Fuji doesn't do a more exciting refurbishing job with the X-T2 - than they have actually done with the X-Pro2 and they also decided to abandon further all professional film like FP100C - what I really require for fine art purposes - I might even fully abandon Fujifilm.

 

Impossible to cope with 4 systems including 2 analog alive - I need to make a choice somehow and I might put the fancy but in fact a bit to expensive MILC-stuff aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...