Jump to content

Fuji X-E3 rumors


Patrick FR

Recommended Posts

That's a critical issue for me. I still use an old X-M1 alongside my X-E2 just because a tilt screen is so handy for low and high angle shots.

 

The Series 3 sensor is making the X-M1 look a bit dated, so I wouldn't want to be still using it alongside an X-E3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then just buy an X-T20, jesus.

 

As usual people want everything for 500$.

 

The X-T line is a modern (more video oriented, features features features) line made specially for people like you.

 

The X-E/X-PRO line is made for photographers who make pictures, and want a camera that does not get in the way so they can concentrate on what matters (making good pictures. Hint : shooting random people doing nothing special in a street from the hip do not yield great pictures. It's a fun hobby tho. Macros never made legendary pictures either, they are very quickly forgotten.) Or I see another usage, people who want the easiest pockatable and light camera for hiking or street (with the 18 or 27 one doesn't need a bag, and at home they can use more lenses), the X-E line is perfect for them.

 

 

For this 2 kind of people, a tilt screen only adds bulk and complexity, and is something prone to break. It is not needed.

 

I think the products are perfectly lined up. 

Edited by citral
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fujifilm X-E3: "Some New Technologies not Previously Seen on Any other Fujifilm Camera“ (Trusted source)

 

 

 

 

Maybe this will be a camera that you can instruct to go out on her own and take pictures for you  ^_^ ideal for deniability. " I have no Idea your honor it was the camera own initiative "

Link to post
Share on other sites

This teaser is annoying. Just post the real rumor when ready, not this "I will reveal you something exciting in very few time" childish thingy, thank you.

 

it would not change anything

 

why? Let's do it like you suggest and wait for permission to share.

 

Ok... got permission, I write the rumor

 

"Fujifilm will implement feature XY in the X-E3. But another source says there will be more new features"

 

Ok... there is still a vague rumor about "more new features" that I can not answer, because I have no clue what they are.

 

So I have 2 option:

 

1) share the rumor and say that, even though I have no clue what it is, a trusted source told me "more new features will come"

2) do like you suggest and do not tell anybody that the X-E3 will have new features, until (if) I can find out what they are

 

I prefer to share what I have... and in this case it's a vague hint (more new features).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then just buy an X-T20, jesus.

 

As usual people want everything for 500$.

 

The X-T line is a modern (more video oriented, features features features) line made specially for people like you.

 

The X-E/X-PRO line is made for photographers who make pictures, and want a camera that does not get in the way so they can concentrate on what matters (making good pictures. Hint : shooting random people doing nothing special in a street from the hip do not yield great pictures. It's a fun hobby tho. Macros never made legendary pictures either, they are very quickly forgotten.) Or I see another usage, people who want the easiest pockatable and light camera for hiking or street (with the 18 or 27 one doesn't need a bag, and at home they can use more lenses), the X-E line is perfect for them.

 

 

For this 2 kind of people, a tilt screen only adds bulk and complexity, and is something prone to break. It is not needed.

 

I think the products are perfectly lined up.

Great images are not sll taken from eye level, and a tilt screen is good for low level shots. And for people with man-sized hands and noses, the X-T20 is too small, and the central viewfinder is awkward to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
    • All software is the latest between camera and app. All settings are correct on camera. I have both lossless and uncompressed RAW files on the card in the camera. I have been up and down every reddit thread to no avail and am losing my mind… I’m doing all of the right things. It even sees my camera. It just doesn’t create the “drive” for it (see attached image screenshot).  Please Help! 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...