Jump to content

image sharpness


Ruta
 Share

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Im new to photography, I've got Fuji X-T4 camera. Watched many videos on how to take photo's, played with camera settings. I was taking product images. Photos I'm taking are not sharp although I've set up recommended shutter speed, aperture etc. Im using ESDDI studio lights. Image on camera screen looks nice but when transferred to PC screen looks terrible.  What am i doing wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good to me - maybe its how you are viewing the image.

I notice that your link shows a low res version until you click on the show full resolution message.

Try downloading the full resolution image and viewing it - maybe try a viewer such as FastStone if the default Windows viewer is giving you problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The EXIF settings are below the image on the left side. The lens name is missing though, but just guessing from the entry for Maximum Aperture = 4.0, it could be a 35mm or a short zoom.

As Greybeard mentions, the low-res version as well as the larger version looks okay. Some things to note:

1.) The x and y resolutions are set to 72 dpi. On a computer screen which uses 96dpi or 120 dpi, you can run into some scaling issues from the monitor’s display algorithms that can make it seem softer than it is.

2.) You are shooting at f4, which does not have a deep depth of field such as what you may expect coming from cell phone cameras. What that means is that some parts of the image will seem soft or out of focus compared to others depending on the selected focus point — for example: the pen is fine, the letters seem soft. Try using f8 or f11 or even f 14 as a minimum for this shot and see if you get “sharper” images. Depth of field is an artistic effect that takes some getting used to.

HTH.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerryy! How is it going!

The lens in 16-80. I load jpg in Capture One and see that sharpness slider set to zero. It could be due the camera setup. When you switch the sharpness off  images might looks realy soft.

1s.JPG.f51caf75dcdd931ad4c3734cd70259d3.JPG

I adjusted it as it should be and it helps a bit

2s.JPG.989e2c280f5f896ba558dd11e86916b5.JPG

Ruta, if you have RAF file as well post it here. C1 can show where the real focus point in the image is.

Edited by mdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mdm said:

Hi Jerryy! How is it going!

Hello back at you! I am still ‘Alive and Kicking’. How are you doing these days?

But always though, as you and Greybeard show, I cannot get lazy in looking at these images, I should look closer. But the image, as shot, looks okay to me. 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, mdm said:

Hi Jerryy! How is it going!

The lens in 16-80. I load jpg in Capture One and see that sharpness slider set to zero. It could be due the camera setup. When you switch the sharpness off  images might looks realy soft.

1s.JPG.f51caf75dcdd931ad4c3734cd70259d3.JPG

I adjusted it as it should be and it helps a bit

2s.JPG.989e2c280f5f896ba558dd11e86916b5.JPG

Ruta, if you have RAF file as well post it here. C1 can show where the real focus point in the image is.

 

Apologies it took a while to get back to you. I had to retake a photo and share a RAF.

thank you for your help 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/14b7P2XHNJ14pzhtaQGEFUMubnrE5CJew/view?usp=sharing

Link to post
Share on other sites

858171266_Rutas-DSCF1000.jpg.b090f369f1ebbcc7d2d6cf227ccb61c0.jpg

This is the effect you get from shooting at f4 i.e. shallow depth-of-field (DOF).

If you look at the regions, the red one is 'sharper' than the green one or the white one. If you look closer at the green one and the white one, as you look from the center of the image out to their respective edgee, the 'sharpness' fades out evenly -- based relatively from where the camera was held.

If MDM is online today, he can show you some PP (post processing) ideas to remove softness. In the film days. photographers used various techniques to 'fix' the images such as unsharp mask and other contrast enhancers. Digital photographs sometimes need that same approach.

From the taking-the-shot perspective, for things like you have here, try using more DOF by way of increasing the f-stop. Start at say f5.6 or f6.4 and go up from there, but do not be surprised to find yourself shooting at f11 or so. There is also a technique called 'focus bracketing' that can be really handy for shots like this.

Do not be afraid of boosting the ISO to keep the image from being dark, the X-T4 has plenty of noise free latitude. Of course, there are tripods.

Uhh, at the risk of changing the subject, if you are intending to print these, try changing your camera settings to 300 dpi over your current 72 dpi and use the Adobe color space instead of the sRGB color space. But why do that is the subject for another different thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jerryy said:

858171266_Rutas-DSCF1000.jpg.b090f369f1ebbcc7d2d6cf227ccb61c0.jpg

This is the effect you get from shooting at f4 i.e. shallow depth-of-field (DOF).

If you look at the regions, the red one is 'sharper' than the green one or the white one. If you look closer at the green one and the white one, as you look from the center of the image out to their respective edgee, the 'sharpness' fades out evenly -- based relatively from where the camera was held.

If MDM is online today, he can show you some PP (post processing) ideas to remove softness. In the film days. photographers used various techniques to 'fix' the images such as unsharp mask and other contrast enhancers. Digital photographs sometimes need that same approach.

From the taking-the-shot perspective, for things like you have here, try using more DOF by way of increasing the f-stop. Start at say f5.6 or f6.4 and go up from there, but do not be surprised to find yourself shooting at f11 or so. There is also a technique called 'focus bracketing' that can be really handy for shots like this.

Do not be afraid of boosting the ISO to keep the image from being dark, the X-T4 has plenty of noise free latitude. Of course, there are tripods.

Uhh, at the risk of changing the subject, if you are intending to print these, try changing your camera settings to 300 dpi over your current 72 dpi and use the Adobe color space instead of the sRGB color space. But why do that is the subject for another different thread.

Thank you Jerryy! I'll definitely try it out :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ruta, I've checked the RAF in Capture One and you can see it shows the focus plain of the image painted in green.

3s.JPG.23c47f12a85a57e7dd7d40c8fcb21267.JPG

So, as Jerryy pointed out it's a very thin DOF that makes the most part of the image unsharp. Besides even shooting at F11 or F16 from this perspective you hardly get all-in-focus image. I agree that focus bracketing or focus stacking is the only way to go here.

What about your lens it's perfectly fine. I upload processed file and as you might find the area which is in focus is tuck sharp.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MuOChe5snmYV_Fqv13qeMqmN_LeRg5iD/view?usp=sharing

 

Edited by mdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mdm said:

by the way Ruta you shouldn't ignore black & white photography )

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E5iGA5h-rbcVwjeqPf_6u5yLU4DzOmS9/view?usp=sharing

I love b&w photography but this shoot was done as a request, it had to be on colour.

 

 

27 minutes ago, jerryy said:

There is something almost magical about well done black and white photos!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say, this may be the nicest forum I've ever been on. Thank you all so much for your help. I only hope that one day I know enough to pass on the knowledge to someone else. I will certainly investigate/try the techniques that you have all mentioned. Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Hercules Cluster M13 (84 minute equivalent exposure). From a dark place, you can see this one in the northern sky just by looking up. Of course, having more than 100,000 stars in the cluster helps brighten it up a bit. https://www.messier-objects.com/messier-13-hercules-globular-cluster/ https://earthsky.org/clusters-nebulae-galaxies/m13-finest-globular-cluster-in-northern-skies/ https://science.nasa.gov/m13-great-globular-cluster-hercules  
    • I am guessing you do not have another lens? Can you rent or borrow one from your local camera store?
    • Gentlemen, I suggest you not to use bell collars. Let's imagine every time you move you have this "ding ding" in your ears.
    • Must be the firmware. I have this lens and the 33, which are great btw, and had a problem with the latter. I tried to update to the latest version, the problem is there are two, a white silk screen and a golden something. Once the updated was done, the lens started to focus continously. I deleted all the updates and installed one of the two, I don't remember which one. Then the lens worked perfectly. The problem is the Viltrox customer care doesn't exist. I tried to contact them to know the difference between the two updates, but nobody ever replied.
    • When I used the 50r for a couple of years I used my 2012 iMac 27" with 1TB HD, and 16GB of Ram as well as my 2014 MacBook Air with 8G of Ram and 256G HD Was it the best?  For me it was.  I shoot both JPEG & RAW at all times - and the files loaded fast enough.  The most I ever loaded at one time was over 9,000 files after a month in Colorado.  Does it take some time? YES.  But since I'm not a run and gun guy and am retired and don't do weddings or events any more I don't mind the wait as I have other things to do. Now that I have the 100s those machines listed above just CHOKE.  They do work, but you need the patience of a saint plus don't even think about doing HDR/photo merges, etc.  Not happening.  Since I bought my 100s I've switched to a 2020 iMac 27"  5k retina with 16G of RAM.  I find the 100s files quite zippy - and I"m talking about the raw files as after I review the jpegs to decide what I want to keep/edit I chuck most of them.  My iMac is a intel I-core 5 which at the time was the basic model available.  Initially I bought it for my spouse to do her work on which is why I did not get more ram.  Had I known I would move my work flow to her iMac I would maybe have purchased more memory.  But, so far, I've done the 400MP stitching, photo merges, etc in LR and Photoshop, and I use Capture One for my post-processing and I am extremely happy. Another item which I started using at the beginning of the year for the 50r and the 100s files is my iPad Pro.  I find that device to be a beautiful piece of equipment that I use both at home and on the road.  It's smooth, great and true color reproduction and FAST on JPEG's and RAW.  Since I only have the 512G version I use USBC Samsung Externals when needed.   In a four weeks I'm headed to Alaska and the Arctic for two months to shoot travel and stock.  I'm not taking my laptop - only my iPad Pro.  I love working on it and have developed a workflow that works for me.  I'm packing two Samsung T5 SSD 1TB externals, plus two Lacie Rugged 1TB externals for storage and backup.  If I need additional storage I can pickup another external pretty much anywhere until I go to the more remote locations. Hope that helps.    
×
×
  • Create New...