Jump to content

Any specific sensor cleaning products to recommend?


MrPolite

Recommended Posts

Complete noob here and never had to clean a sensor before. I've tried the rocket blower and spots show even at f/8 - quite terribly at f/11 and above. 

 

It seems lik the gel sticks aren't best for Fuji because of the sensor coating. Any particular product/brand to recommend, please share here :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As pointed out in the other thread, you are only partially right about gel cleaners not being fit for Fuji, because apparently at least SOME brands have a version for “ normal” sensors AND a version for Sony-Fuji mirrorless camera sensors 

 

 

https://photographylife.com/product/sensor-gel-stick-for-sony

 

“........One of the best solutions for keeping your Sony and Fuji digital camera sensors clean! This sensor gel stick is designed specifically for Sony SLT and Alpha mirrorless cameras, but will also work equally well on Fuji mirrorless cameras. ..."

 

 

I am adding my post on the other thread here, although I am against double posting of the same content because someone might miss all of what I have found out by a little research on line

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you know the story of the guy who comes to fix your telly, he takes a little hammer and hits it in a corner, the telly works immediately and he says that it will be alright for another 5 years and then he asks $100.

 

You look at him as if he was crazy and say “ What !?, $100 for hitting the telly with an hammer, I could have done that! “ and the guy looks at you and says “ Ah! But unlike you, I knew where to hit it!” 

 

If you have a piece of gel that does the work and doesn’t wreck your camera, please, do it!

 

Nobody has to buy these gel sticks, it is after all not compulsory, so it is hardly a “ rip off" but what’s the alternative?

 

Having your sensor cleaned, in my neck of the woods, once only, would cost 2/3 of that amount of money.

 

 

 

So cleaning the sensor with a gel stick, appears to be rather simple affair and one that you can use at least 20 times. (both products talked about before are shown in the following videos I find the second video more explicative though)

 

@https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxKb_OqV7ng

 

@https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fetJfPILU3o

 

Wet cleaners are interesting for some application where the gel stick might fall short

 

 

BUT...

 

 

Having learned that the Sony/Fuji/mirrorless cameras has a coating that is incompatible with the gel used for the Nikon sensor, what makes you think that the cleaner would be good for the Fuji sensor?

 

@https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vrahdr5eqqY

 

@https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFgSchx54og

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am perplex.

 

What does this Con-story have to do with some folks (several brands) selling a seemingly efficient product to clean camera sensor at a price that seems to disturb you?

 

Con-men have always been there and so have expensive products. 

 

You can buy the gel stick or not if you find it too expensive.

 

I don’t see the analogy with Mr. Martin Shkreli

 

All I know is that, if I have the sensor cleaned it is going to cost me 2/3 or as much (depending where I go).

 

The wet clean seems to me a little more dangerous and complicated.

 

It costs a bit less but it doesn’t come for free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...