Jump to content

XT-4 IBIS performance with different focal lenght lenses


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

First of all i like to express how happy i am with the XT-4  .  I use to own an XT 20 and i really like this small camera but a few things make me save money and buy the XT-4 .  

I have an interesting question for you XT-4 users and its about the IBIS system.  

I am using Manual lenses only.  the AF and lens communication is turned off in my body.  I use the manual focus on the lens, the manual aperture and manual ISO.  my shutterspeed is in A most of the times but when i need a certain shutter speed than i will choose that as well .. 

All my lenses are PRIME .. i dont own any zoom.  

My list of lenses:  

12mm Samyang  F2.0  //  21mm Kamlan F1.8 // 35mm Samyang F1.4 //  50mm Kamlan F1.1  version II  // 85 mm Samyang F1.8  //  105mm Vivitar F2.5 Macro series 1  // 200mm Vivitar F3 series 1 

Now, there is a lot of info to find about how IBIS is handling Fuji lenses and how many stops you can gain by it.  

My question is this.  with what lens will IBIS be the mose usefull ?  Do i get a real benefit from IBIS using my 12mm lens.. ore will it perform any good at 200MM ?  there are 6 slots in the camera to preset my lenses ..i have 7 ......  so what lens should i not put in the preset list since it will barely benefit from the IBIS ?  

What can you say in general about the IBIS in the XT-4  with manual lenses ? 

Thanks in advance for your answers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your suggestion, but 70 is too tele for me, I did some shots regularly at 50, 55, 60 on my 16-80.
    • When considering the 55-200 also have a look at the 70-300. There's not much difference between f4.8 and f5.6 at the long end and the 70-300 is certainly a faster focusing lens. I'd buy the 55-200 only when it is a great second-hand deal. There's only €100 difference between the two lenses when purchased new. In that case I'd go for the 70-300, but that's just me... 😉 Best Fujifilm Telephoto Zoom Lens 2021 | Photography Blog
    • Thank you! This is great news. Fujinon XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 R LM OIS has got nice price, and its aperture in the range of 55-80mm is a little faster than on Fujinon XF 16-80mm f4 R OIS WR that I own, but at 200mm it's f4.8 which I can't tell is usable. I bought 16-80 for indoor sports but also for general purposes like landscape and architecture to complement my 35mm f1.4. For indoor sports, I used it in the range of 50-80mm so far, and I needed some more zoom, but I also know that at some other gyms that I've been before even the 35mm was fine when I could place myself near the court. Not sure if 55-200 is ideal solution for sports either, but it's much cheaper and lighter than 50-140. Heck I think even f2.8 is too small aperture for indoor sports. If I don't go for 50-140, I would most likely go for 55-200.
    • The push function on the rear-dials of the 'earlier' X cameras is quite prone to defects. I believe it was solved in the X-H1 and the X-T3 thereafter, but X-E3's have the earlier internal design. The push function could 'stick' in one function or between functions causing the rotate function not to work properly. If that happens, internal cleaning or replacing is the only option. Something that (most of) you can't do yourself.
×
×
  • Create New...