Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For reference, the Sony A6000 is €750 now in all the well established retail stores, or €700 in some web-shops.

Starting at €800 at launch that's a €50 difference with the €850 X-T10, assuming it will show a similar decline in the months to come.

 

Personally i would gladly pay that difference to have the Fuji, should i have to choose.

Not to mention the 16-50mm II that is definitely less of a compromise in performance than Sony's pancake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess, that the X-T10 is targeted level lover than X-E2. From the looks of the buttons, it offers less customization than X-E2. Maybe future fuji product lineup is going to be something like:

 

ragefinder X-Pro2

slr-like X-T1

ragefinder-like X-E2

slr-like X-T10

ragefinder-like .... and so on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

efikk,

 

 In some ways X-T10 controls are improvement over X-E2 buttons. For example, instead of a multiplexed "drive" button we now have a dial with direct access to all drive modes without multiplexing.   In some ways less, for example there is no more dedicated AE button to multiplex between metering modes. However, I guess you could program one of the other functions buttons on the 4 way or the dedicated function button on the back to take the place of the "AE" multiplexed button.  Also, I am not yet sure what the "Auto" switch does  next to the Shutter dial? Does it simply put camera into full Auto/Programmed Exposure mode?  I guess that could be useful at times if one need to make a quick shot with no time to change the direct exposure controls.  I guess we won't find out until later.

 

Other than a dedicated multiplexed AE button to switch between metering modes, are there any other missing buttons or controls which make you believe X-T10 is lower than X-E2 what could not be replaced by the programmable 4-way or the dedicated fn button on the X-T10?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Auto switch according to Fujirumors activates Full Auto with scene recognition.

 

This is like SR+ mode on the X-M and X-A series (i would guess), and this is good because i must say Fuji's scene detection actually works really well.

See youtube (like the fujiguys videos) about those cameras for a demonstration.

 

But i've used SR+ (previously EXR) in real life and i know the beginner will be very happy with this, or more likely spoiled by it -not realizing how good it actually is. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Which direction is the light source coming from in the dark images? For example, if it coming from behind the subject, a common occurrence known as backlighting, put some light from the front toward the subject — you can do this with a flash unit, or by using various types of colored reflectors. Or, use long exposures with various grades and types of graduated neutral density filters to bring out the dark areas without blowing out the highlights. Or try bracketing exposures. There is a technique called ETTR, expose to the right, which will bring out shadow detail but risks blowing out the brighter sections. This may help in understanding DR settings as well as Dynamic Range Priority: https://www.jmpeltier.com/fujifilm-dynamic-range-settings/ p.s. The situation you are describing has been one photographers have struggled against since cameras and photographers have been around.  
    • Hi, I'm looking for some Fujifilm HDR RAF image samples from the X-T4, X-Pro3 or X100V cameras. These cameras should store 3 RAW images inside the RAF image file in HDR mode. In need it, to verify my own software, but don't find any downloadable samples on web. Can someone help? Christoph
    • I would like to get your comments on the following problem of mine: Occasionally, I do get too dark JPG pictures with X-T50 - when the scene is contrasty; I think this is the very situation. This can happen when sun shines from a blue sky or the sky is cloudy but still very bright. I find these outcomes strange, as in many other (more or less similar) situations I find that the exposure is balanced. Is there any remedy for this, as I cannot completely figure out as to why this happens. Photometry is at the most common center-weight setting. What factors/settings can affect the picture's exposure in X-T50 (in the situation I describe)? For JPGs I've set the dynamic range on (DR400 with ISO500). Can that do it?? I thought it balances contrasts... Well, I can adjust the exposure on a computer but that is extra work for holiday pictures.
    • Like Jerryy says you can scale you image down so that it can be uploaded - that way we aren't guessing. The only symbol that looks like a camera is the Continuous Mode symbol - but it normally has "L" or "H" next to it rather than a "1"
×
×
  • Create New...