Jump to content

Affinity Photo and Compressed RAF files.


PatrickF

Recommended Posts

 

Hi,

My first ever post on these forums so hello to everyone, I've done a search but was unable to find anything that relates to the issue I'm writing about here, so my apologies if that isn't the case and could someone kindly point me to that thread?

Before I proceed and in fairness to Affinity Photo checking down their list of supported cameras and at the time of writing, I couldn't see the X-T4 listed so the issues I'm experiencing maybe due to that model not being supported yet.

For the benefit of those that don't have this feature, in the I.Q. menu of the X-T4 there's a menu labelled 'RAW RECORDING' with 3 options: UNCOMPRESSED, LOSSLESS COMPRESSED AND COMPRESSED.
If I take photographs using either UNCOMPRESSED OR LOSSLESS COMPRESSED open them in Affinity Photo no issues, however if I attempt to open the COMPRESSED version of the RAW file all I get is a an image that's split 50/50 down the middle on one side it's totally black and on the other side it's totally white.

I can't replicate this issue in Photoshop, Camera RAW, Capture One 20 or Luminar 4, even Windows Explorer gives me a thumbnail preview, my work around is to convert the files to another format e.g. tiff or similar and I can open the image for editing in Affinity Photo.

Has anyone experienced this, if so are there any other work-arounds? It's no biggy as I'll avoid the  COMPRESSED option, but I thought I'd raise this for the benefit of others and also for anyone that's interested in double checking my findings.

For the record I'm editing using a Windows laptop but I've also tried and experienced the same on my Windows based desktop computer.

I have posted a similar thread on the Affinity Photo forum but still waiting for someone to review the message.

I saved the 3 images out as jpgs from Affinity Photo and have attached them to this topic, labelled according to the setting I used in camera.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks jerryy,👍

Well! I certainly cocked that one up for a first time post, although I did look at their list of supported cameras even doing a search on the web page I didn't see the X-T4 listed.

Once again thanks for responding jerryy, I will book an appointment with the opticians.

Regards,
Patrick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

When I take pictures, it turns out that every photo in the camera is too small. I didn’t know how to solve this problem, so I went to Google. There I found a man who told me that this is a photograph format problem, and to fix it you need to reformat in some program. So I did, I went to the torrent via u1337x.org, and then I downloaded the first program for formatting photos. It helped me.

Edited by DonmikoF55
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...