Jump to content

X-H1 Face/Eye Tracking Firmware v2.10 vs v2.11


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A few weeks ago I stumbled on a Youtube video from user Unnamed for a Reason (https://youtu.be/35VcYn3AobY) where the X-H1's eye tracking performance with the latest firmware update is demonstrated.  I wasn't aware of the v2.11 update and it brought my attention to it.  Chatting with him in the comments section he told me X-H1 users in a forum noted an improvement in eye tracking which prompted him to do the test, but he had already update the firmware and couldn't really provide a solid comparison.  I loved his methodology for using movies as a tracking subject because it controls more variables, and since I hadn't updated the firmware myself, set out to perform the test in a similar manner.

I had intended to record the results in Video Mode with AF-C and Single Shot with AF-S to compare face and eye tracking in the respective modes but with the hassle of setting it up, some trials and failed attempts over a few hours, I somehow neglected to record any Single Shot footage before the firmware update.  Still, I reasoned the face tracking in Video Mode might reflect the kind of performance difference in Single Shot before and after the update.  The default tracking settings were used so there may be ways to tweak them and get better results.  Movie sequences were chosen for the wide variety of shots and some fast cutting, and also to see how close you can get to an actor before the face is no longer recognized (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, and Once Upon a Time in the West), to test how it does with long takes (Kill Bill vol.1, Goodfellas), and seeing how the tracking fares with the face being obstructed every now and then (Pulp Fiction). 

The completed video comparison is a little over 25 minutes with some surprising results (the new firmware doesn't always outperform the old).  The X-H1's LCD screen was recorded with another camera and the plane of focus is off sometimes.  The settings are displayed for those who are curious.  Some sequences were only recorded once using the parameters as the whole thing was time consuming enough as it is, and although the methodology is not 100% foolproof and scientific I thought the community here might appreciate what was captured.  If there are any questions, feel free to ask in the Comments section.

I make no claim over the recorded materials and am not trying to profit from the video but I do have some concerns Youtube may take it down due to copyright infringement.  Without further ado, here ya go:




Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I wish they release a firmware fixing these indeed !. because the other methods seems a bit complex... let's hope.. because fujifilm used to listen to users since the start...
    • Hi all  A new X100V owner. Some reviews mentioned that a lens filter is required to make the camera weather resistant. What type of filter ? Just a normal UV filter? Also any recommendations of lens hood? Does the lens hood create shadow when using the inbuilt flash? Any other accessories I need to consider?  Thanks 
    • I'm in exactly the same position. For professional work I've moved away from Fujifilm, but for personal work I still love the X-Pro2 form factor. The X-Pro3 indeed misses the point for me. Next to a number of improvements (faster AF, better EVF, placement of the diopter adjustment and exposure comp dial) there are some crucial misses for me: the sub screen is nothing but a gimmick and looks cheap on this camera. The tilting screen is exactly the wrong implementation, whereas the X100V is exactly right if you want a tilting screen at all. Same for the ISO dial. But the main issue for me was dropping the X-Pro2 dual magnification in the OVF rendering the X-Pro3 OVF useless for anything wider than 23mm or longer than 50mm. So I returned the X-Pro3 I had on trial and kept using my X-Pro2 (although I mostly use my M10-R and Q2 nowadays). Now, the X-Pro models have always been niche cameras for Fujifilm. Therefore the launch of newer models followed roughly a 4 year cycle. So, logic dictates that we should expect a new model around Oct 2023. If at all, because a friendly retailer (one of the larger online ones in Europe) told me that X-Pro3 sales were initially good due to X-Pro2 owners replacing their camera, but dropped sharply thereafter and is now way under previous X-Pro2 levels. As said before, this is a niche camera in a rapidly shrinking market (digital camera sales dropped between 2011 and 2021 by over 90%) and it's a rather expensive one too. Priced in 'full-frame territory'. Potential buyers love the looks, but buy an X-T3/T4 (of a full-frame compact like the Z5, A7C or S5) because it's more convenient with better options. What doesn't help is that the newer f1.4 lenses (the 18, 23 and 33) are all substantially bigger and render the OVF on the X-Pro's useless, while at the same time some of the crucial compact lenses (the 16/f2.8 and the 23/f2) in terms of pure image quality are not Fuji's best. Long story short, the X-Pro3 is a rather expensive niche camera with the relative low sales numbers to match that. If at all, the successor isn't likely to be expected before end 2023.
    • Good question. I have wondered the same thing. I have an X-Pro2 and was considering the X-Pro3 until I read the specs. I am waiting to see what the X-Pro4 looks like. A lot of my reasoning is simply that I really like the camera I have and I would only make the jump to a newer model if it offered some feature or function that I really wanted. I use the display on my current camera quite a bit - just to check battery status or show a photo to someone. I don't like the way the display on the X-Pro3 was done. I really hope Fuji goes back to something else.
    • I love my X-Pro2 but I would not "upgrade" to the X-Pro3, I don't like the flippy screen and definitely not the way it has been implemented. I don't like the rubbery finish. The X-Pro was supposed to be the leading edge APS-C camera but clearly that is the X-T4 or possibly the X-H2 very soon. To me the X-Pro is the right size but has been forgotten. I really don't want an SLR anymore but to me the X-Pro3 misses the mark. So has it been a success compared to the X-Pro2? I am wondering if the replacement will return to amore conventional X-Pro2 style format without the gimmicks.
  • Create New...