Jump to content

How to take advantage of 10bit video? In Premiere I can't see difference between 8 and 10 bit video. Both have same banding :(

Division Video

By Division Video
in Fuji X-T4

 Share

Recommended Posts

Division Video Newbie

Division Video

Posted
Posted

I bought the X-T4 for my next movie because I can't live with banding anymore.
I'm doing some tests now. I want to shoot in 2K 10-bit at 24 fps. But when making a sequence in Adobe Premiere there is always ugly banding.
When I put 8 and 10 bit side by side I only see a thin color difference but the same banding.

So what's the plot???????

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
carlo macchiavello Rookie

carlo macchiavello

Posted
Posted

Premiere show and work ever with 8 bit project, only if you enable high bit depth processing you can see or render out with all bit depth (no comment).
To preview bit depth you must go to menu / sequence / sequence settings, and enable in panel opened "maximum bit depth". this option allow you to see correct preview of 10bit, later when you want to export remember to enable "maximum bit depth" ALSO in export panel or you preview in MBT but render out in 8 bit...
anyway check davinci resolve, is very better option to edit, vfx, color, manage your movie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...