Jump to content

Lens Recommendation to mimic P900/1000 Functionality?


Luna_Tick

Recommended Posts

On the long end, the p1000 is a 3000 mm FF equivalent.

Longest native lens is the 100-400 mm. Couple it with the TC 2x you get 800mm, so 1200 mm FF equivalent. 

You'd get much higher quality than the pxx00 with that combination but far from the focal length.

You will never get such a versatile zoom range in one (or even 2) lense(s) on the Fuji system.

 

Edited by flamidey
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/22/2020 at 1:36 PM, Luna_Tick said:

@flamidey Thanks! What are your thoughts on using the Canon EF 800mm with a Fuji camera? Strange that there are no competitors to the Nikon ultra zooms (which are so Amazing for astronomy, actually). I was hoping there would be a Fuji-compatible DIY solution that beats the p1000/p900 in all areas (of performance/quality).

Missed your reply, sorry.

You will probably have a hell of a time focusing at 800mm unless it's a completely static subject or using very high aperture numbers.

The 800 will only give you 1200mm equivalent anyway, so off by a wide margin.

If you're going for astro at 3000mm, you are going to need a 2000$ mount and you won't be able to see anything because you'd be at f11+ equivalent (except for moon).

For the moon, you will get the same or better results with the 400 + 1.4x than with the p1000. The p1000 has a 1/2.3" sensor. That's 13 times smaller surface, which means you can crop a lot from the APS-C of the Fuji and get equivalent results.

You will probably need some kind of stabilization, either a very good tripod or a stabilized lens (like the Fuji 100-400)...

A few links about Astrophotography and the Fuji :

https://fujifilm.blog/2018/04/30/an-introduction-to-astrophotography-with-your-x-series/

https://www.myfujifilm.co.za/news/2019/10/24/an-introduction-to-astrophotography-using-fujifilm-x-series-cameras-by-jon-kerrin

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4251928

Edited by flamidey
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...