Jump to content

X-T3 video file size issue


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wonder if anyone can help. I'm shooting video on an X-T3 and running into a file size problem. The file seems to corrupt when it hits the size of 4.29gb

For example: after transfering to my Mac, the video duration will be listed as 10 mins, but it will only play up to around the 5 minute point and then freeze. Looking at the transfered file size it will be listed as 4.29gb. So it appears to hit a wall at this size.

But if I watch the video on the camera it will play the full 10 minute video. So it's not corrupted in camera. Just in the process of transferring out.

I'm on a Mac, with OS Extended (Journaled) so no file size limit there? I've tried transfering, using Image Capture, on two different Macs - 10.14.6 and 10.12.5

I've updated the camera to the latest firmware 3.21

My SD disk is 64GB Sandisk Extreme Pro 170MB/s  - so this should work?

So I'm stumped as to why it wont transfer out of my camera to the Mac?

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This shouldn't happen - what do you see if you look at the files on the card without transferring them?

How large are they?

Try reformatting the card in the camera and create another video (over 4GB) - then look at the file on the card without transferring it - is there a single file and how large is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyone's help.

The video clip plays in camera, so it's not corrupted at source. It's just in the process of transfer to my mac and always hits a 4.29gb wall. I'm doing a direct transfer from camera, and I think this is the problem.

I don't know how to check the file size of the video clip in camera, but I'm postive it's over 4.29 gb.

It's about 10 mintes long, and only plays for 5 mins before freezing - after transferring. So my guess is its about 8gb in size, and for whatever reason the Xt3 transfer process limits it to 4.29gb, even though the firmware was updated to record clips longer than this.

Based on the other thread, listed above with the same problem, I've ordered a card reader so hopefully that will solve the problem!

I'll report back later with an update.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...