Jump to content
thl70

Metebones Speed Booster mount question

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Ever since I started using manual lens on my fuji-x I've been wanting to experiment with more manual vintage lens.  Focal reducer caught my attention and am in the process of learning about different lens mount.  I am trying to figure out the most versatile mount to get in order that I can adapt different lens to in the future.  So in case for classic manual lens would the Canon FD mount bet the most versatile?

Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The FD mount would be one of the least versatile. It's essentially FD/FL and M42 only in terms of adaptation, and the M42 adapter is rare.

If you want versatility, go Canon EF, as most SLR mounts adapt well to EF mount. Canon FD and Minolta MD are the only significant exceptions to that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By John Rourke
      Helios 44mm/f2
    • By John Rourke
      Helios 44/f4
    • By chuck77
      I shoot primarily fashion and portraiture, and have been using a Sony A7 since 2013 with Sony/Zeiss glass with great results for the most part.
       
      As my photography improves, I have been gaining a better understanding of my style and have been looking for ways to enhance that style.  Essentially, I enjoy photos that have a timeless, vintage look, and sometimes dreamy look to them instead of modern photos that look just like a 100% true representation of the present reality.  
       
      I know that this look could probably be obtained by using photoshop, tools like VSCO, etc (and this is likely what most people do).  However, I have never enjoyed spending hours to manipulate a photo, nor do I find the results very satisfying (perhaps due to my limited knowledge of post-processing too).  My solution became a simple one, where I began to explore the advantages of the mirrorless system by buying legacy lenses with the appropriate rendering for my style.  In this case, I bought a Zeiss C-Sonnar 50/1.5 for M-mount.  This approach worked well and gave me results that were vintage looking with lower contrast and the all important classical look.  Of course, it is no secret that the characteristics of the lens translate directly to the sensor and the final photo, making it difficult to change my mind about the mood of a photo after the fact.  Another problem is that the lenses are still not optimized for these mirrorless systems, and lens sharpness and performance is understandably lower as a result. There is alot of trial and error involved in finding and testing the right lenses with the appropriate rendering to fit the mood I am looking for.  Yesterday, I bought a Summicron 50mm f2, and ended up not liking its rendering with my camera.  
       
      This had me rethinking about my approach, since I also have an XT-1 that I have been borrowing, which is fantastic and achieves similar results with film simulations which could be altered after the photo is taken.  Even when compared to Leica lenses, I find the Fuji glass is every bit as good, especially in terms of colour, sharpness, and micro-contrast.  Yes, the photos must still be sharp to be acceptable, but for the most part, I prioritize lens rendering over sharpness.  I don't need to have the sharpest lens in the world, but it has to be sharp enough for my use for photographing fashion and portraiture.  
       
       
      What are your thoughts on my approach?
       
      Does using legacy vintage lenses produce a unique mood and rendering to the photos that is not possible to be created in post-processing?
       
      Instead, is it far more desirable to shoot using a neutral lens with extreme clarity and sharpness, and then adjust the rendering, colours, etc. in post-processing?  
       
      Is Fuji X the solution?  
       
      The photos attached shows my Jpegs straight out of camera with no editting using:
      1) Girl with blonde hair - Sony A7 with Zeiss 50/1.5 C-Sonnar
      2) Door - Fuji XT-1 with 23mm/1.4
       
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content.
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content.
    • By zuluviper
      Hi
       
      I have just bought a second but near mint x-e1 which I have paired with vintage lens. I am using a canon fd 50mm, and a Takumar 55mm and have found the images to be soft.
       
      I have also used a 35mm Fujian and the images are sharper.
       
      I think I am using the camera wrong. I have updated to the latest firmware and can see the focus peaking. In the evf the image is sharp but when I half press the shutter release the image seems to get softer and I refocus, I also use the ring button to magnify the subject and refocus but I am getting soft images. 
       
      Is this the property of the lens I have? or the as I suspect the way I am using the x-system. Your guidance would be much appreciated.
       
      Many thanks.
    • By everydayfuji
      Took this photo on the grounds of a museum....
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...