Jump to content

Recommended SD Cards for Fujifilm XT-4

waneijs

By waneijs
in Fuji X-T4

 Share

Recommended Posts

waneijs Newbie

waneijs

Posted
Posted

I am planning to purchase the new FujiFilm XT-4 when it is available in NL. 

With the launch of the XT-4 FujiFilm removed the supported SD Cards from the compatibility section on their website.
The link is still present on the XT-3 specifications website but the link is not working anymore

* 1 Please see the Fujifilm website to check memory card compatibility
https://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/compatibility/card/x/?_ga=2.36026537.881780981.1588514698-1422211324.1588514698  

I am planning to shoot both video and stills, and I selected two SD cards of 128 GB SDXC V90 UHS-II on their specifications and price

Does anyone have any experience with those SD cards?
Is there any way I can verify with FujiFilm which 128 GB SDXC V90 UHS-II are supported or recommended by them?

W.A. Neijs

Link to post
Share on other sites
Greybeard Proficient

Greybeard

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have used the ProGrade card on my X-T3 and been happy with the results.

The only curious problem I had was in mixing SanDisk and Prograde UHS-II cards in different slots.

So based on that experience I'd get two copies of the same card.

(Even for the X-T3 the specific card recommendations from Fuji were outdated)

Edited by Greybeard
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Kasumi3344 Enthusiast

Kasumi3344

Posted
Posted

Yeah according to Ken Wheeler who fixed cameras, and used/owned almost every lens, Lexar is trash.  

Search YouTube videos:  All FUJIFILM.....please STOP sticking LEXAR SD cards in your Fuji.

In a email he said "USE SANDISK 300/MB ONLY".  Avoid "Prograde", and especially "Sony" and Lexar.

Until Sandisk gets their head out of their backside and makes faster cards we will just have to make due.

Some bonus advice (search YouTube)
ALL Mirrorless DON'T Please DON'T burn your mirrorless sensor!
Angry Photographer: THANKS LEXAR!! .....for BRICKING my DSLR....trash cards
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Pierre Enthusiast

Pierre

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 6/17/2020 at 7:50 PM, Kasumi3344 said:

Yeah according to Ken Wheeler who fixed cameras, and used/owned almost every lens, Lexar is trash.  

Search YouTube videos:  All FUJIFILM.....please STOP sticking LEXAR SD cards in your Fuji.

In a email he said "USE SANDISK 300/MB ONLY".  Avoid "Prograde", and especially "Sony" and Lexar.

Until Sandisk gets their head out of their backside and makes faster cards we will just have to make due.

Some bonus advice (search YouTube)
ALL Mirrorless DON'T Please DON'T burn your mirrorless sensor!
Angry Photographer: THANKS LEXAR!! .....for BRICKING my DSLR....trash cards
 

 

I mainly use Lexar and have no problem at all ! Stop promotting only Sandisk in many threads which is not more reliable than Lexar, Proglide, Sony, etc ! Ken Wheeler is not a guru !

Edited by Pierre
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
Rick Corbishley Newbie

Rick Corbishley

Posted
Posted

I am just about to buy some new sd cards for my new X-T4. I have been using 128 GB Lexar UHS-II in my X-T3 and 1 for a few years and had no problems. This thread is interesting. I've only ever had one card fail which I believe was Transcend but I was able to recover all the files. Maybe I'm lucky but I guess any card can fail, luck of the draw if you buy a decent branded product

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
moreeazy Newbie

moreeazy

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 11/17/2020 at 10:09 AM, waneijs said:

 

It's funny, this is not an error,  I thought that as well, while "Storing" means "error" in dutch. 
But it only means that it's storing info to the card. It's storing the picture, it mostly comes up after HDR or something that takes time. So it's not an error. 

Quote

 

 

Edited by Olaf W.
Quite corrected, hopefully
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
kiko Rookie

kiko

Posted
Posted

Possessore solo da qualche giorno di T4 e, provenendo da analogica, ho più di qualche difficoltà di adattamento, l'età è quella che è e non aiuta..Sono riuscito a settare a mio gusto col menù e libretto di istruzioni, è una base per ora che col tempo affinerò. Il mio problema è che da qualche tempo mi appare la dicitura "memorizzazione" dopo ogni scatto. Ho formattato pur non avendo raggiunto il limite di capienza della scheda, rifatto la personalizzazione e riletto tutte le istruzioni per l'ennesima volta ma non se ne parla. La dicitura permane per un paio di secondi dopo ogni scatto, cosa che con le prime foto non faceva. Cosa devo fare per eliminare questo fastidioso annuncio? Grazie per l'aiuto, premuroso che sono ancora alle aste e puntini ..

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...