Jump to content

X-T3 hevc video codec rate distortion / quality issues


Recommended Posts

Obviously I don't have documentation for Fuji internal configuration of its video encoders for X-T3, but looking at a reference h.265 implementation manual, it seems rate distortion is a parameter used to increase compression at the cost of video frame rate distortion - namely jumpy video.


I find that 60fps 4K DCI 10bit 4:2:0 hevc long gop max bitrate is unusable because it is way too jumpy; 50 fps 4K DCI 10bit 4:2:0 hevc long gop max bitrate almost tolerable but does not look professional when object moving side to side with even moderate speed look like you selected the wrong shutter agle (I didn't) or it is dropping frames (I don't think it is). Even at 23.976 or 24 or 25 I still notice it sometimes - which doesn't make sense since the available bit rate is so much higher at the lower frame rates.

I tried asking Fuji and they said they looked at the video (and they were engineers not tier one help desk) and said they would have another group get back to me but have had no response for several months.

My guess is that the rate distortion quality setting is too aggressive. I have not tried external recording 10 bit 4:2:2 - maybe someone can confirm that the behavior disappears if the camera is not actually recording just passing through? I am especially interested in 4K DCI 10 bit 4:2:2 external 50 frames per second (I plan to post to 25fps - but as mentioned I notice this in all frame rates).

It is frustrating that they got so close to perfect value priced high quality cinema camera except for this behavior.

I am attaching a link to a small clip where you can see the traffic is jumpy left to right but not into camera - presumably these exercise different limits of the encoder - one causing rate distortion to fit within the bit rate available.

On the other hand it could also be that the Fuji engineers just left the parameter at a default setting (28?) that does a very bad job and could have set it lower and still fit within the bit rate available. But I am just guessing since I don't have access to any of the Fuji codec docs or parameters used :(

Does the Medium Format camera have same issues for 4K DCI video? At all frame rates?

Attached via link are two very short examples - but it doesn't matter if camera is on tripod, handheld, etc - always this jumpy motion for lateral movement.




Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • As @Greybeard wrote, there is more going on than just saving a changed setting. Even if it were only that, it would still be tricky. Different settings take up different size spaces in the file. Trying to overwrite that can easily wreck the file. Early computer based EXIF editors would not do more than report settings for the raw files they would allow users to read. Your Velvia image file may take 2MB more storage than the Provia one, but changing from one to the other seamlessly would be difficult to pull off without a massive amount of processing. All while doing other camera stuff. RAF is vastly different in what it does than JPEG or TIFF or ...
    • I didn't know about that JPG. But for me it would be handy if the "RAW including that JPG" could be updated. I don't want to bother about editing photos on a computer. I just use the computer for archiving them and I "use" the photos on the tablet where I have my viewing archive. Just ideas. Digital photography could be so "easy" or "convenient" if all those things were possible. I want the pictures, good pictures. I don't want to bother with software. Sometimes it is a little detail which can make your experience so great, or which can spoil everything.
    • Yes I used that software years ago with an X100F, but  then it stopped working, because the new software no longer worked on my computer (32 vs 64 bit). At the moment I am a Linux user on a 10 year old machine. My most modern "computer" are my phone and tablet.
    • Its a little more than just the metadata - there is also a 13MP jpg stored in the RAF file - if the RAF file was to be updated I'd probably prefer another copy.
    • Have you tried using the Fujifilm X Raw Studio software on a computer? You can still use the camera for the actual conversion and it would solve most of your problems in naming and batch conversion.
  • Create New...