Jump to content

Fuji XH1 grainy images with 10-24


Rowey

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone 

I have recently purchased an XH1 which I love! I have also just purchased a 10-24 and have been experiencing grainy almost out of focus images with low speed landscape images. I always use a tripod and have my ISO locked on L. I have tried various apertures around f8 to f13. I have a CPL fitted and sometimes a grad filter depending on the conditions. 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar head scratcher recently with the 15-45 and H1. For a lot of shots, it was almost impossible to figure out, where the focus actually lies when shot at around 15mm.

I came to the conclusion that it was a mix of reasons that led to blurry images even at f8+f11:

- shot against the sun (cloudy early morning) reduced (micro) contrast

- longer shutter speeds vs slightly moving foliage

- comparing jpg preview of wide angle vs narrower angles at high zoom levels in cam, ended up zooming closer for the same/a similar detail in wider angles. Shot raw+jpg and the jpgs imported from the cam show way more detail than the siblings shown in the evf and screen after shooting them. Adding higher zoom levels when looking at 15mm vs, say, 30mm didn't help either but it's a weird behaviour of mine I guess.

 

 

Edited by cowonaut
punctuation
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 10-24 is a great lens. If you're on a tripod, I'd be inclined to:

- turn ibis off

- set to f8

- set to iso200

- adjust shutter to get exposure

- remove filters (for now)

- manual focus using the indicator and peaking

I've used this lens extensively and it's sharp. For video, it produces great colours and contrast under artificial light such as stage dance and drama (which is what I spend most of my time filming).

Also, eliminate the obvious such as strap swing, loose tripod, nearby vibrations such as roads/trains etc.

Let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...