Jump to content

XC 15-45 + X-T2


Zastavia

Recommended Posts

I have recently acquired the great little XC 15-45 lens, and despite the annoying retract when you want to review photos, this is a sharp lightweight gem. I have encountered a strange issue though which initially perplexed me while using my X-T2. When shooting at certain shutter speeds, this lens will produce eerie ghosting effects, almost like a double image. It is as though the lens IS shifts the elements slightly to the left with each shot. I have been a photographer for many years and have not encountered anything like this on modern system cameras. I have tried both IS modes but to no effect, and a variety of focal lengths and apertures which have no impact. The problem seems to be associated within certain shutter speeds between 1/10 and 1/160 sec. Under or above those speeds the photos are fine. I have attached some photos to show this most odd problem. Now, through experimentation I have found two cures for this issue: the first option is to simply disable the IS mode, and the second is to leave the IS mode enabled but to use electronic curtain on the shutter option which for me is preferable. Both of these set-ups create a solution and resulting photos are normal and sharp right down to hand-held speeds of half a second or so. All firmware for lens and body is latest and up-to-date. If anyone has encountered this bizarre problem with this lens and camera combination I would like to hear of your thoughts.

Photo below: 1/20 sec, f/5.6, 45mm, ISO 200, IS: Continuous, M Shutter. <> Middle photo: 1/52 sec, f/5.6 15mm, ISO 200, IS: Continuous, M Shutter. <> Bottom photo: 1/20 sec, f/5.6, 15mm, ISO 200, IS: Continuous, E Shutter

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...