Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I understand that the x-pro 3 can now combine up to 9 exposures with different blending modes in-camera. I'm very interested in this feature for creative use for which I have had to depend upon Canon up until now. Reading through the manual doesn't answer all of my questions and there isn't currently a demo model available where I live.

Can the final composite image be in raw file format or is jpeg only offered?

Can multiple exposure be assigned to one of the function buttons?

I would be very grateful if someone who has the new camera can contribute to our understanding of how Fujifilm have implemented the multiple exposure feature. I am sure that this can attract new users to the brand.

Many thanks.

Edited by Mr Michael
didnt enter title properly, new to site
Link to post
Share on other sites

JPEG only

Already is dedicated (unless overridden) to the DRIVE button (rear, center, top), and can be added to Q menu.

Please in ME DRIVE mode, follow screen prompts (up to 9 total exposures).  Menu configuration of stacking exposure method.

Quote

Can the final composite image be in raw file format or is jpeg only offered?

Can multiple exposure be assigned to one of the function buttons?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...
On 7/31/2020 at 8:54 PM, Bowportes said:

Actually, on the X-Pro3, a separate raw file is saved for each exposure of the multiple exposure.  These could then be processed as raw files and layered to achieve the same multiple exposure that you get out of camera.

Thanks for replying. It's nice to have the option of saving RAW individual files as part of a multiple exposure but I would rather determine an individual final file to be saved as RAW. Returning to software later to try and replicate the image isn't quite the same experience as in-field production.

Perhaps final image saved as RAW can be requested as a firmware update although i'm not sure how to do that? It's great that Fuji have got at least  this far with the feature.

Edited by Mr Michael
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/5/2020 at 3:41 PM, g2iSite said:

JPEG only

Already is dedicated (unless overridden) to the DRIVE button (rear, center, top), and can be added to Q menu.

Please in ME DRIVE mode, follow screen prompts (up to 9 total exposures).  Menu configuration of stacking exposure method.

 

Thanks for your reply. It seems that the X-Pro 3, X-T4 and X-E4 all now offer the same multiple exposure feature. Just waiting for this to be added to the X-100V and also for RAW final output.

According to the manual the X-100V just has double exposure with basic blending modes although apparently internal processing is the same as X- PRO3. Looking at the firmware updates the expanded multiple exposure feature hasn't been added, not sure why?

If you go to the trouble of producing a multiple exposure in the field then surely you're going to want to edit a RAW version of this file without any additional steps. This is what I would like anyway. Kind regards to all!

Edited by Mr Michael
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2022 at 9:51 AM, Mr Michael said:

Thanks for your reply. It seems that the X-Pro 3, X-T4 and X-E4 all now offer the same multiple exposure feature. Just waiting for this to be added to the X-100V and also for RAW final output.

According to the manual the X-100V just has double exposure with basic blending modes although apparently internal processing is the same as X- PRO3. Looking at the firmware updates the expanded multiple exposure feature hasn't been added, not sure why?

If you go to the trouble of producing a multiple exposure in the field then surely you're going to want to edit a RAW version of this file without any additional steps. This is what I would like anyway. Kind regards to all!

Apologies for digressing on a niche subject but I just found an online video which shows that the X100V does feature the 4 different multiple exposure blending modes, so it's just the manual which is incorrect.

see blending modes at approx 1:10.30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOVQ1xW3fw4

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...