Search the Community

Hi, anyone that has both could please chime in commenting about difference in sharpness? Even people shooting with other brands are welcome (I've been a Nikon shooter for a decade, and a Canon one for another decade). I have a pretty complete Contax setup, and I'm not sure if buying Fuji glass would make a meaningful difference in sharpness (besides other benefits like AF, OIS etc.). A few details: - I shoot landscapes, mostly, my cameras are 90% of the time on a tripod and I need the ability to print on matte and semi-matte paper up to 120cm / 47" - my Contax setup (for reference): 18, 35, 50/1.7, 60 Makro, 28-85, 100-300 - Fuji setup I plan to buy: 14, 23/1.4, 56/1.2, 18-55 (only for walking around and seascapes, when I can't change lenses without water drops landing on the sensor), 55-200 I am already adapting the Contax glass to the Fuji, and yes the results are generally pretty darn good (the partial exception being the 18mm). But I guess I'm just wondering how much more can I "squeeze" from the Fuji with better native lenses (better than the cheap 16-50 xc) considering that even the über-cheap 16-50 is really quite sharp. Thanks in advance!