Jump to content

V30

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

V30's Achievements

  1. I could be wrong but I don’t think you’ll get much magnification with those lenses. My Raynox 250 seems to work much better with at least a 100mm lens behind it, and 200-300mm would be even better.
  2. Fuji 80mm macro, Fuji 30mm macro, Fuji 70-300 with some attachment to get 1:1 (extension tube or Raynox etc), or one of several manual focus options available.
  3. 8-16, 16-55, 50-140, 150-600….and someone to carry it for me
  4. That’s odd. Is the Q menu still assigned to the Q button?
  5. I have the xt5 and the 16-80. The 16-80 seems to be a very good lens even on the 40mp sensor. I am in the process of comparing it to the tamron 17-70 f2.8 which I assumed from reviews would be significantly sharper. It seems marginally sharper on some photos and on others the 16-80 looks sharper. With the back and fourth I’m seeing I’m wondering if it’s due to the focusing of the xt5 rather than the resolution of the lenses. Not quite finished testing but so far I’m leaning towards keeping the 16-80.
  6. I have the viltrox 13 that I use on an xt5. It’s an extremely sharp lens with good color and contrast. When I pixel peep I’m always impressed with the sharpness. It does have some distortion towards the corners though which I don’t recall reading about in reviews. The 16mm I owned but it’s been a few years. I enjoyed that lens also. It’s not as sharp as the 13 if memory serves me and I believe it’s a bit softer towards the corners also…but a very good lens none the less. 3mm doesn’t sound like much but it’s enough that you could own both. I’d probably go 13 since it’s a very good lens, it’s cheaper and you can crop to get the 16mm field of view….then pick up the 16 later if you feel the need.
×
×
  • Create New...