RedDogUSMC

I like 27mm as well, but as I have the XF33, I might give this a pass and get that 75 f1.2 instead.

I watched him for a while, basically becoming an analysis on his mental health. Not good. You will see patterns and issues over time. He has subscribers because he is controversial and they buy his BS for a while, and that's okay if you are entertained. The key here is that he complained about the things that he either praised or ignored in the past on the X-H series. He dislikes the ergonomics but it is virtually the same as the X-H1 and the GFX series that he LOVES. The battery charger being excluded is a deal breaker! LOL! You just paid what for this camera and are buying CF cards for how much? And a few bucks for the charger will kill you (plus most people who had the X-T4 will have this charger and an extra battery or two)? The hilarious part is that he was shunned by Fujifilm and then he quickly brought out a video trashing them. If that isn't obvious to everyone that he was just being a petty and vindictive man-child then I give up. Don't forget, he knows more about cameras than anybody, has more lenses than anybody, worked on more cameras than anybody, and is smarter than everybody. And yet he can't figure out how to put the fork down.

I may be super late for this post, but if you shot and liked the 24-70 f 2.8 then get the Sigma 18-50 f2.8. Better image quality than the 16-80, much lighter, less expensive, and a good focal range. If you want more focal range the Tamron 17-70 is a good option, but bigger and heavier than the Sigma. I had 2 copies of the 16-80 (good ones) and was not impressed (it's okay), but I REALLY like the Sigma.