Giampaolo Masserano
-
Posts
398 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
72
Content Type
Forums
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by Giampaolo Masserano
-
-
Dear friend,
I had the GF 23 and 30 and I replaced them both with the GF20-35.
No regrets: the zoom is of the highest level, not heavy and of similar dimensions to the 23mm.
You can find some photos in my gallery.
Don't think twice: 20-35 for life... The Laowa is a good lens but if you try the Fuji zoom you will never go back.
-
I got it right!!!
As I asked some time ago, Fuji is working on a GFX 500 f5.6!
That is, EXACTLY what was missing from the road map of objectives.
-
You have to go to the menu and activate shooting with various types of lenses and an adapter ring.
Find the instructions on p. 127 of the manual.
I easily configured the camera to use Pentax 6x4.5 lenses
-
HI
I bought the GF 20-35 a few weeks ago and I am very satisfied.
The sharpness is formidable from edge to edge, the construction rock solid, the balance excellent.
At the same time I also used the GF 23: the performance of the two lenses are similar but the zoom is much more versatile.
In my PHOTO gallery you can see some shots taken with the GF 20-35.
The only flaw is the very high price but still well below, for example, the Hasselblad prices.
-
The FUJI GFX catalog lacks a "serious" telephoto lens.
In fact, the choice stops at the GF250, which corresponds to a 200 on the full frame.
I hope that at least a 400 or 500mm will be built and produced soon, perhaps not too bright otherwise it would be too heavy.
For example a 400f5,6 or a 500f6,3 (naturally with the possibility of mounting the 1,4X): in this way, even the price would not be..."crazy"
-
Dear friends
I ask you all: in your opinion, which lenses are missing in the GFX catalogue?
In my opinion, for example, a telephoto lens is missing, such as a 400mm f4 or a 500mm f 5.6 or f8.
In fact, I find it strange that FUJI stops at the GFX250...
What do you think about this?
-
Not at all, I just can't ...
I try to delete a photo but it stays in the album ... I entered it twice by mistake.Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…
Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!
-
I tried but the photo is NOT deleted immediately.
After clicking on "REMOVE THIS ATTACHMENT" should I then click on "SAVE IMAGE"?
Thank you
-
How should I delete a photo from my album that was entered by mistake?
-
20 minutes ago, cpX said:
Are some nice objects to see in the photos. Unfortunately, someone exaggerated the image editing very much.
In Italy we say: "not all flavors are mint ..."
-
...but for photography enthusiasts there is a lot of curiosity...isn't it?
-
On 9/30/2022 at 7:54 PM, cpX said:
So I'd rather take photos than wait...
Me too, just look at my gallery ...😉
-
I use an ancient method.
A blower to remove the dust and then a cotton swab after having breathed on the viewfinder glass to "mist" it.
Never had any problems ...😇
-
We are ALL waiting for the MTF tests of the GF 20-35, to verify if the optical quality is comparable (or better?) to the fixed lenses (in particular the GF 23 and GF 30) !!!
We hope that some independent company will soon examine this lens which, on paper, appears to be very good.
Meanwhile, it is known for sure that deliveries to stores will be delayed due to the shortage of electronic parts and the large number of reservations.
-
When I used Leica reflex (film), a technician suggested a very light lubrication using (with extreme caution) a cotton swab with a single drop of lubricant and then wiping with a paper towel to distribute it better, eliminating any drop even the smallest.
With the digital sensor so exposed, you have to be even more cautious.
I also had the same problem with the GF35-70, but after some assembly / disassembly the necessary force decreased. The new "bayonet" must also be "run in" due to the presence of the rubber seal ring
-
Hello schoepy
I have owned the GFX 50S-II since March (with around 2000 shots) and this problem has not occurred yet, thankfully. The problem of burnt pixels is typical and unique to the sensor structure and seems to afflict many cameras of many different brands. I think the cause is the frenzied rush to resolution / sharpness, which generates increasingly "dense" sensors: it is clear that among many millions of pixels "someone" can go wrong ...
-
It is mandatory that every memory card (new or old) MUST be formatted when it is inserted into a camera.
Simply moving it from one camera to another is not enough because there are dozens of EXIF data and hidden codes that can conflict with cameras from different brands.
What's missing from the GFX lens catalog?
in Fuji GFX Lenses
Posted · Edited by Giampaolo Masserano
I think I have the gift of foresight... 📸
The GF500 f5.6 is a reality!
And at an affordable price, too...