Jump to content

marpar

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    marpar reacted to fleckintosh in Capture One Pro 8 Film Simulations   
    @dfallsfilm:
     
    This profiles are not from adobe.
     
    I like to quote an aswer of scottie wang, who did this awesome Job:
     
     
     
    "I always download source RAW from imaging-resource. They always have quality shots and it's totally free.
     
    For my profiling process, I use three commercial software listed below.
     
    1.PICTOCOLOR INCAMERA : for ICC profiling (32bit photoshop needed)
     
    support chart->http://www.pictocolor.com/incamera.htm
     
    2.PICTOCOLOR EditLab Pro : for profile fine tune
     
    3.Babel Color Patchtool : color matrix Extraction
     
    process in brief
     
    step1.Use Patchtool to extract your OOC picture , the extracted file need further editing to get the right matrix text format.
     
    step2.Open the souce RAW, set ICC to "Adobe RGB 1998", use C1PRO to export 16bit TIFF.
     
    *I always export in Adobe RGB. If I wanna do ARGB->SRGB color conversion, I would do it in photoshop.
     
    step3.Open file from step 2 in photoshop, run INCAMERA plugin and include file from step 1 to extract the ICC
     
    step4.Use EditLab Pro to fine tune ICC ,and it's done
     
    There is indeed some freeware for ICC profiling. (COCA, Argyll...)
     
    I believe there must be some way using these freeware to get the same results as mine.
     
    But I didn't spend lots time on it, maybe you can try them by yourself."
     
     
     
     
    I cannot. So i am very grateful someone did.
     
    The profiles work very good for me. I compared with ooc images (Same RAW) and noticed just very little differences. Very little.
  2. Like
    marpar reacted to darknj in KAIZEN IS BACK: Fuji France says: “Firmware Update for the X-E2 will come. Release date not yet fixed!”   
    None taken, and to stay on your point. Look at it the other way around. They could have NOT said anything, let the frustrated ppl buy the X-T10 for the new features and still launched the X-E2S for those that didn't grab the X-T10 and still leave everyone with X-E2 waiting for the XE-3 to be released.
     
    Many manufacturers (*coughs*Canikon*coughs*) would have done it that way and everybody would have been "fine" with it.
     
    Remember they are still a business and making money is still their number one goal. Everything else is secondary. Any business company that tries to convince you of anything else is purely and simply lying.
  3. Like
    marpar reacted to darknj in KAIZEN IS BACK: Fuji France says: “Firmware Update for the X-E2 will come. Release date not yet fixed!”   
    They all do this nowadays. They even make cameras out to test water and make customer pays for the R&D for some specific features or an algorithm that will be used in the next flagship.
     
    Granted, Fuji might not have a super tight control over their FW and might skip some Quality Checks for new releases of FW, but where have you seen anything even remotely close of that from other manufacturers ?
     
    Canon almost never release any good FW for any camera, Sony had to be bemoaned at for several weeks before the introduced the 14 bit lossless compression ? Even Nikon is going to release a FW patch for the unreleased D5 because there have been enough ppl complaining about the ridiculous 3min 4k recording.
    But they are all doing it for their flagship cameras, the lower lines are pretty much disregarded.
     
    The X-E2 is still a 2 years old camera, I still find it remarkable that they still try to improve the features.
  4. Like
  5. Like
    marpar reacted to milandro in KAIZEN IS BACK: Fuji France says: “Firmware Update for the X-E2 will come. Release date not yet fixed!”   
    marpar, welcome to the forum, the “ like” button is best used when one agrees!   
×
×
  • Create New...