I'm loving the kit lens at 23mm but since the aperture is similar, 23mm would be kind of reduntant IMO.
The 35mm was the lens I was most leaning towards but looking at the 50mm, at two stops lower it's a very tempting proposition.
I've been shooting specifically at 18, 23, 35 and 55mm checking out the images and I love them all in different ways. loved the 18mm's width for "action" recording or "full house" pictures.
23 was nice when I wanted to do a kind of a portait but heavily in context (subject takes a smaller part of the shot)
35mm was great for portaits from close up but it was a bit **too** close to the subject. It yielded great pictures though. A bit grainy due to higher ISO.
at 55mm was at a good distance to the subject, good pictures, different than the 35mm. Higher ISO though and was hunting for focus a bit.
Both 35mm and 50mm f/2 sound great and it's a difficult decision tbh but I get more difference out of the 50mm f/2 (vs f/4) than out of the 35mm f/3.6
I know both 50 and 35mm do great for video and are nice and fast when focusing.
I'm also considering the 33 f/1.4 because it's roughly at the same distance from the kit lens as the 50mm f/2 is and I might like the 33mm more than than the 50 but unsure yet.
Thanks!