Jump to content

paulga

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

paulga's Achievements

  1. i already have 35mm. here is what i thought. i would take a wide for senery (10-24) and a tele for wild life (90) in my trip. 23mm 1.4 is large. though it can create some magic that 10-24 cannot, most probably i will not carry both in travel. 10-24 is more essential for landscape. 16mm 1.4 can shoot some interesting photos due to its fast aperture. maybe i can pick it instead of 10-24mm in a travel because 16mm is more versatile.
  2. 56mm is out of question for now Because i dont shoot indoor portraiture a lot. then both 16 1.4 and 23 1.4 come to eyes. both are good lens. the samples from the both are stunning. which is the one to pick?
  3. I already have the 90mm F2 and uses it to shoot wildlife/portraiture, very satisfied with the IQ, sharp in focus and creamy bokeh out of focus. During a trail I constantly need to switch between the 10-24 mm and 90mm lens. I'm considering adding one lens. 56mm is highly praised for portraiture shooting and its samples are stunning. But would the 56mm kind of redundant when I already have 90mm even though it's faster at F 1.2?
×
×
  • Create New...