JLR

The 56 isn’t a stabilized lens either, but maybe you meant that if the 90 *was* stabilized it’d give you similar capabilities in terms of real-world ability to gather light? I have the 56 and love the images it can produce, but find the slow autofocus an endless source of frustration on my X-T1. Not sure if it performs better on newer cameras. I also wish it could focus closer, I always find myself surprised that I’m too close to a subject and get a failed focus. Of course, it’s meant for portraiture, so I understand why Fuji sacrificed that if they needed to keep the size/weight down. Still, would’ve loved if it was speedier/ more versatile so I could have a 1.2 walkaround lens.

Now that we know (because of the GFX) that Fuji's color science isn't tied to the X-Trans, I want Fuji to adopt a Bayer sensor in the X-T3. Whatever improvements the X-Trans offered for moire, it's not worth the poor fidelity in high frequency detail (especially foliage) and significantly increased RAW processing times.