Jump to content

i9zero

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

i9zero's Achievements

  1. Very true, but even with the A7R II, X-Pro 2 cannot match it's ISO capability. It's still one gen tech behind of the A7R II.
  2. Camera is camera. One does have more features and you can do more things with it. High ISO and ability to crop. "Why crop? Get it right?" sure, that works for majority of situations, but working with a team, sometimes after the shoot the decision is made to use a cropped image. You don't have room for crop using Fuji, I would have to reshoot. With a 42MP, I can do so without an issue. It was never my intention to print a billboard, nor lot of pros shooting MF with 50+ to 100MP digital backs. Fuji still isn't able to compete with high ISO against Sony. I shoot A7R II at ISO 10,000 comfortably without the fear of skin texture/color or detail loss issues compared to Fuji. Granted, I may not shoot that high of an iso often, but when you need it, it's there and it works. With that said, If your end game is traditional portraits or landscapes that end up as 8X10,20X30 or social media, you just have to keep it in perspective that you may see all the pixels on your wonderful computer screen, but it'll only end up as 2048px on facebook and majoirity of clients are NOT going to view it in 4K or 6K like images. Not to mention your wonderful printed photo being viewed at a good distance rather than with a nose touching the print viewing every dot. In conclusion, go out and shoot? who cares? buy both or buy all the new cameras out there?
  3. It depends on what you are needs are. I use both Fuji and Sony. I tend to use A7R II more for fashion or high ISO. See example of what I mean. I am more precise with precise composition with the Fuji shooting for fashion. Generally, I can reshoot or grab few other shots, but if one looks better than the other, I can just crop without reshooting or spending more time to get the right look. Again, high ISO, it's not possible to compare against what Sony is able to get out of their full frame sensor with high ISO in mind. I can shoot ISO 10,000 comfortably knowing that it's clean without weird color or detail loss that I would experience with the Fuji. I do love Fuji lenses over the Sony lenses. With that said, it's not a night and day difference with quality when it comes to the higher end lenses by Sony or Zeiss. Choice is definitely limited but it's still relatively new to the full frame mirrorless. I say if you have the pocket, get both A7R II - What I had intended was a full length but ended up with a crop that was more fitting for the need. X-T1 - Still an amazing camera _XT16043 by Mark Lee, on Flickr X-Pro 1 - Even the X-Pro 1's first gen x-trans sensor is awesome. Test 2 : X-Trans by Mark Lee, on Flickr X100S - Can't go wrong with this beast. I printed this long side 36in without any issues. ... by Mark Lee, on Flickr
  4. i9zero

    Uploads

×
×
  • Create New...