Skyyton

I also fine the Fuji camera calibrations match up very well to the corresponding JPEGs in Lightroom. It's convinced me I never need to shoot RAW + JPEG.

The only lens that I ended up selling was the 27mm. I loved the lens for making a "tiny" camera, but found I rarely put it on when getting out of the car in an area I would use it. Once I got the X100T, that lens wasn't used at all. Of the lenses I still own, I would say the 55-200. It produces great images and I like the reach, but for most of my shooting I don't need that much zoom. I will hang on to it though for the occasions I need it. I wasn't going to get the 23 since I had the X100T. It seemed redundant. I couldn't resist though during one of the rebate periods and now it's my most used lens. I found even though the field of view was like the X100T, they both have their purpose.

The latest version of Lightroom 6 and Lightroom CC handles the XT2 files. I think it does a great job! Plus, proper use of the camera calibration and the RAWs come in looking almost identical to the JPEGs.

I have the 10-24 as well as the 16 and 23. I use the 16 and 23 a LOT, but rarely use the 10-24. The 10-24 is a great lens, but I just prefer the primes. It is nice having it when I want to go really wide, but I don't find that need very often.

Love the metal grip. I had one for my XT1 and now the XT2. I makes the camera feel a lot more secure and comfortable.

Hi, I'm Dave from Kansas City. I started shooting Fuji when I bought an XT1 a couple of years ago. I've been slowly selling off my Canon gear and acquiring an assortment of Fuji equipment. Most recently I purchased the XT2 and as soon as I received it, I sent in my XT1 for infrared conversion. I'm anxious to test it when I get back, and if the performance is as good or better than my converted Canon, I will be able to finally cut the Canon cord.