Originally attracted to Sony due to their newfound commitment to cameras and the e-mount, this has been further strengthened by their push into the "GM lenses" realm.
But a part of me wants to have fun again, and support a company who stands behind their cameras, their menus, their firmware updates and, ultimately, their users.
But I cannot let go of the "going back to APS-C" argument, not because I dislike APS-C "quality" per se, but I dislike the inherent 1.5x multiplier on effective focal length or the fewer photosites for lower-light photography.
Fuji reportedly has some good lenses. So does Sony. Sony will out-resolve the X-Trans, but the Fuji punches well above its weight and, well, it's Fuji. Fuji is supposed to have better menus.
How many of you, if any, have really missed that wider-angle lens range of the larger sensors or missed the light-gathering abilities of FF (Sony or otherwise?) I'm not affiliated with anything camera-related, just using this as a talking-point, but if Fuji (theoretically) released a FF variant, how many would "start over" with a Fuji FF, including purchasing new glass? Would it be a huge draw, or something that, sure, given unlimited funds would be cool but doesn't really affect your normal day-to-day or workflow?
Thanks for perspective ...
