-
Posts
14 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Reputation Activity
-
thedwp got a reaction from Xenon100F in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp got a reaction from johant in Streetphotography (open thread)
I don't shoot a lot of street stuff but the Acros option caused me to snap a few the other day. Shot on xpro2
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp got a reaction from Steve S in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.
-
thedwp got a reaction from minguela in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp got a reaction from FujiGlitch in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp got a reaction from mjones41 in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp got a reaction from ClusterFlux in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp reacted to d750guy in My vintage X70 (not for weak hearted)
did you scratch up the LCD screen too?? lmao.
-
thedwp reacted to Marc G. in 16-55 vs Primes
I always wondered why the images from the 16-55 looked slightly harsh, until I found out that the lens suffers severely from CA. Those CA get automatically corrected in LR and leave white edges which made for a harsh look.
I sold mine after a year of much use. I prefer the look of the primes any day. Not because of the larger aperture but because how clean the images look.
-
thedwp reacted to Tom H. in 16-55 vs Primes
If you're shooting for fun, you could always take less lenses Less desire to swap that way. I usually take a 23 or a 35 and that'll do.
The 16-55 is slower, but image quality is still good/great, as long as you don't need ultra fast apertures. For me, the weight is the biggest issue.
-
thedwp reacted to JaapD in 16-55 vs Primes
In some aspects, for instance when shooting at f/5.6, the 16-55 mm is better than the 16mm.
In order to compare the 16 and 56 mm versus 16-55 mm I find this a good site:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-16-55mm-f2.8-r-lm-wr/review/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-16mm-f1.4-r-wr/review/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-56mm-f1.2-r/review/
If you don't need anything faster than f/2.8 I can highly recommend the 16-55mm. When shooting RAW you do need to have a RAW converter utilizing automated lens corrections (CaptureOne, Adobe, Silky, RFC), taking care of pincushion, barrel and chromatic distortions.
-
thedwp reacted to stevemargulis in First Outing with the X70
I recently moved from Micro Four Thirds to an X-Pro2 and I absolutely love the images I've been getting. But I missed having a small bodied camera that was easy to carry everywhere. I was hesitant about the X70 because of the lack of viewfinder and the 28mm equivalent focal length. Based on the great reviews I had read online, I tried the Sony RX100 IV but found it awkward to hold with image quality that was not nearly as good as I expected. So I returned it the next day. After striking out with the Sony, I decided to give the X70 a try. I've had it for a few days now, but the weather has been dreary in Philadelphia all week, and I wasn't really able to put the X70 to the test until today. After a couple hours walking around South Street, I'm really pleased with the camera and the images I'm getting from it. It's very easy to shoot one handed, quick to focus and I only missed a few shots. It's great for street photography because no one seemed to take any notice of me. And I didn't miss the viewfinder at all. Here's a few images from today.
Philly Jesus
Hookah
Cigarette
Doggies
Pull Ups
1941
Dreads
-
thedwp got a reaction from KwyjiboVanDeKamp in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.
-
thedwp got a reaction from Kevin B in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.
-
thedwp got a reaction from jonathan7007 in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.
-
thedwp reacted to rlewis in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
There is no way to tell if these were shot with an X-Pro2 or a "full frame" DSLR. Excellent! Very well done!!
-
thedwp got a reaction from rlewis in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Thanks. I used a simple 3 light setup. I had a 1'x3' strip box with a grid (vertical) on either side of the players and a small octabox (with grid) to fill their face. The lights I used on this were the Baja b4's from dynalite. I used the dynalite trigger as well. We were on the road for 9 days and the whole setup worked well.
I did rent a backup xpro2 just in case anything went wrong. But my personal cam worked like a champ.
-
-
thedwp got a reaction from nathan.mardin in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Thanks. I used a simple 3 light setup. I had a 1'x3' strip box with a grid (vertical) on either side of the players and a small octabox (with grid) to fill their face. The lights I used on this were the Baja b4's from dynalite. I used the dynalite trigger as well. We were on the road for 9 days and the whole setup worked well.
I did rent a backup xpro2 just in case anything went wrong. But my personal cam worked like a champ.
-
thedwp reacted to Aswald in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Okay....tough getting in the field with these guys.
Looks great! XPro2 does the job! Well done!
-
-
thedwp reacted to nathan.mardin in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
These are great! I love the lighting too. Really well done
May I ask your setup for these? Lights, triggers, and what not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
thedwp reacted to quincy in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
But... but that's impossible, the X-Pro2 isn't capable of taking pictures... how did you? It's not even Full Frame! And everyone knows the 56 can't focus!
Very well done!
-
thedwp got a reaction from adzman808 in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.
-
thedwp got a reaction from Aswald in X-Pro 2 Does Pro Rugby
Pro Rugby is launching a league here in the U.S. I was hired to shoot some initial shots and decided to give my Xpro2 a go. Overall I was happy with the performance and especially the quality of the images. I mainly used the 56 and it worked like a charm. Focus was fast and accurate. Dumped all my Canon camera gear and have never looked back.