bonesmalones
-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
bonesmalones reacted to Warwick in 16mm or 23mm for indoor, your opinion?
These were all taken with the 16.
Judge for yourself whether distortion is a problem.
As for the max aperture, from my point of view it really helps when it comes to freezing action and hand-held photography in low-light situations - you get faster shutter-speeds.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
bonesmalones reacted to yukosteel in Which one do you prefer?
I had 14mm as well and very liked it for indoor and landscapes. Later I decided to sell it for photo budget reducing, but then I started to miss wide angle. The optimal replacement happened to be 12mm Samyang, and I like it so much better then 14mm now.
-
bonesmalones reacted to Warwick in Which one do you prefer?
I had the 14 and sold it. It's great for landscapes but I don't do much landscape photography. The 16 is better for people, in my opinion. Specifically environmental portraits and close-up action photography in less-than-perfect light (I'm a skateboarder as well as a photographer, and the 16 is my 'skatepark lens.') It's also brilliant for pets in wet and muddy conditions with an XT1
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
bonesmalones reacted to milandro in Which one do you prefer?
two entirely different beasts with different performances.
If you really think that you will ever shoot a wide angle for its bokeh rendering or its “ speed” at f1.4 and than maybe the 16 is your lens.
The 14 is a more traditional lens and you can find it secondhand a lot cheaper, I personally, between the two would chose that one.
The WR of the 16 lens is pointless, on a camera that isn’t WR.