Hello Fuji-X-Shooters,
I have bought the Fuji 56mm some days ago and I must say that I'm disappointed with the sharpness wide open. I have read numerous reviews and most of them praise the great sharpness, especially wide open. Since the sharpness of my test-images lack the sharpness I have seen in the image samples in all reviews, I have lent me another 56mm to see if the lack of sharpness is due to production variation. Unfortunately, they differ in sharpness, but just ever so slightly that this variation can't be the difference.
To be sure about the sharpness, I have conducted another test yesterday. Before swapping to Fuji mostly, I had Canon equipment and still have my 6D with the 85mm 1.8 (which isn't famous for extreme sharpness wide open). I have made comparable shots with both setups (X-T1 + 56mm 1.2 and 6D + 85mm 1.8), cropped them to 100% and attached them to this post.
I would like to know:
(1) Is this the (lack of) sharpness I can expect from the the 56mm 1.2 concerning your experience? If so, why do all the reviews tell me it is extremely sharp wide open?
(2) Or did I accidentally get two crappy lenses, which I think is possible, but unlikely.
(3) My last guess is, that the lack of sharpness is due to my postprocessing. I used Adobe Lightroom 5.7 to convert the RAW-Files into DNGs, both with the Canon and the Fuji. I have heard of the problems with sharpness due to the bad RAW conversion of Lightroom, but didn't expect it to be that bad.
What do you think?
I have attached three files. The two ending with -1 and -2 are crops of the eyes of the Fuji image done with the sharper of the two 56mm. The one ending with -3 (the sharp one ) is from the Canon.