Jump to content

Interview with Mr. Takashi Ueno from FUJIFILM Tokyo – “Why don’t FUJIFILM make full frame DSLR?”


Aswald

Recommended Posts

APS-C is good enough for most purposes. I too like to pixel peep, but don't kid yourself, in print you can hardly see the difference anymore... Sensors have just become that good nowadays. I too get GAS when I see the new A7R II specslist. But thinking of my old Canon lenses, I can't see myself going back to that size and weight anymore. I already felt the X-T1 +56/16 was too big for holiday purposes, and envied my wife taking the X100T every day...

 

Now dynamic range and ISO performance, that's where still some nice work can be done...

Link to post
Share on other sites

APS-C is good enough for most purposes. I too like to pixel peep, but don't kid yourself, in print you can hardly see the difference anymore... Sensors have just become that good nowadays. I too get GAS when I see the new A7R II specslist. But thinking of my old Canon lenses, I can't see myself going back to that size and weight anymore. I already felt the X-T1 +56/16 was too big for holiday purposes, and envied my wife taking the X100T every day...

 

Now dynamic range and ISO performance, that's where still some nice work can be done...

 

My sentiments echo yours......

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has a good argument up to the point where he says that an f1.4 lens on APS-C will use a faster shutter speed than Full Frame at f2.0. That is not the case when you account for the Full Frame camera being able to use a higher ISO with equivalent image quality.

 

That does not negate the fact that most f1.4 lenses look horrendous wide open. I love hearing that Fuji is trying to leverage their sensor size by giving people excellent IQ at fast apertures, which is a legitimate strategy.

I can't wait to see some more sharp f1.2 lenses, and hopefully they get in on the f2.0 zoom lens game.

 

Speaking of wide apertures and the recent advent of Sony BSI sensors...

 

Current architecture loses significant amounts of light at extreme wide apertures (www.dxomark.com/Reviews/F-stop-blues), but the lack of circuitry in front of the light collecting pixels on a BSI sensor should greatly reduce the effect. We may even be able to make use of f1.0 lenses again.

Theoretically even the current f1.2 and f1.4 lenses should see big gains from the use of a BSI sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that statement was made with all things being equal, i.e. ISO setting being the same on both.

 

The XF35 F1.4 and XF56F1.2 looks pretty good wide open to me.

 

Before stacked sensor, Fujifilm's move to narrow the gap between the rear elements and sensor plane was a good move. This was achieved by designing an entirely new mounting system which is why F1.4 and F1.2 of a Fujifilm lens/X Camera is considerably sharper edge to edge than conventional systems. It also allows for a slightly smaller dimension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...