Jump to content

Who has taken Fuji on safari?


TonyB

Recommended Posts

Off to Kruger NP on May/June of this year & wondering how Fuji gear -XT2 + 100-400 has performed for Fuji users compared with Canon fit long teles.

My dilemma is whether to buy the 100-400 for a Fuji only kit or go with 150-600 Sigma & 5DIII + XT2 + 18-55. I have read in many places that the 100-400 is not quite as good as the Canon set up which is why I have not taken the plunge on the Fuji lens before now.

Flying South African Airways so don't know how strict they are with carry on weights. In previous birding travels to Asia & Europe going over carry on weights has never been a problem. There is also an internal flight from Jo'berg to Nelspruit.

Edited by TonyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just in SA in dec/Jan...went to krueger...as well as a few days at private game reserves.  I brought my xt2 and the 100-400 w/1.4 tele.  I also had another fuji body with my 18-135.  While I can't comment on canon...the fuji system worked out well for me on safari.  I used the 100-400 most of the time but there were also numerous occasions I needed a shorter lens to capture closer action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just returned from two weeks spent in Africa:  Uganda to view the gorillas for two days and Serengetti and the crater for four more, an additional day in the parks outside the crater also.  

 

I brought the 18-55 but used the 100-400 85% of the time and marveled at the OIS function.  Used bean bag on the Land Cruiser, when needed more throw.  This lens is special and with proper use of ISO can be used in low light situations nicely.  Made big mistake of being on Manual focus ( unrealized)  for a day and missed half the shots until I corrected.  

 

Used the big battery grip which I think is essential for long days shooting and multiple shots on CH.  Bring plenty of batteries (7) and recharge at night.  I brought a battery power pack in case I was away from electricity for a night.  Shot JPEG and RAW in #1,#2.  

 

Highlight was a treed leopard that posed nicely for twenty minutes, but saw all the animals as the weather in January was superb.  Hope this helps.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. Will bear in mind  your airline comments especially as I always book extra leg room. 6'6" does not easily fit into normal seating. Fortunately I'm an "athletic" build so width is not so much a problem. However I find seats give no head support being so low at the back-relatively speaking of course.

I have booked a 100-400 for the day for this coming Monday so will find a quiet reserve with plenty of birds and do a comparison.

If I had all Fuji gear I would take 2x XT2,100-400 & 18-55/55-200, Along for the ride 10-24 & 35 f1.4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was in the Serengeti and the crater in dec. the lens did very well. my only recommendation is that you limit it to 380 mm - the only unsharp pics i have are between 380mm and 400 mm.

 

From what i understand, kruger has open vehicles so bean bags may not be much help. Ask your safari provider/camps for pictures of the vehicles, and you should get an idea of what you'll need.

 

Dust is a definite problem, so try and take 2 bodies - one with a shorter lens. I had a lioness walk right up to the vehicle and the 100-400 was just too long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While at krueger...I did NOT use my beanbag once...I did not have any room as the "jeep" was pretty full.  Additionally dust was not an issue for me as i had 2 bodies with different lenses and when I wasn't shooting I had my lens facing down at the seat.  I did not have the grip...and doing mostly bursts I had no issues with running out of battery.  I brought like 8 batteries on the trip but honestly could easily have gotten away with 4.

Edited by ullmandds
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have tried the 100-400 & am still undecided as to whether I purchase or not. As luggage weight is not a problem I may well take  Canon 5DIII & Sigma 150-600 & hire a  Fuji 100-400 for 2 weeks.. Cost will be about $220 & I will have all bases covered + back ups. Weight is still far far less than taking a 5D111, 1DIII,500 f4 & 100-400,16-35 & 24-70.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I didn't use cascable... stayed with just the two fuji apps
    • Buttons Fn1 and Q stopped working
    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Hi everyone I have a problem while using my xpro3 and strobes, from a day to an other I started to have a black shade on the side of my ID photos so it's kind of problematic. It's like if the speed is to high except it happened even at 1/30s. And the shutter speed seems accurate with ambiant light so I'm a bit disturbed about all of this.   Anyone has an idea about that case ?
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
×
×
  • Create New...