Jump to content

WiFi security with Fuji Remote


Lonerangefinder

Recommended Posts

what exactly is your concern? 

 

wi-fi is not in itself secure on the contrary it is very easily cracked but what is that you are afraid to be hacked into?

 

Recently a Dutch experiment revealed that a wi-fi controlled camera was hacked in minutes after installing. There will be ways to defend yourself against this but:

 

1) you will be doing this only sporadically 

 

2) your wi-fi range requires someone to be rather close and to want to hack your camera, what is the likelihood of this to happen if you move around?

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The story on 12th August 2019 is that cameras can be infected with ransomware by remotely tricking the camera into installing a malicious firmware update. A test was conducted on a Canon EOS 80D. Access via WiFi or Bluetooth. Give us the money and we'll let the pictures go. You get to view the threat via the EVF or Screen.

So, is it possible to turn off the WiFi or Bluetooth on an X-T2?

Sources are Threatpost, Mashable, Engadget, PCMag also ShortList reporting on research from Check Point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...