Jump to content

Lichens


merlin

Recommended Posts

Thanks for sharing your beautiful pictures from places most of us will most likely never visit.

 

I once looked at them from close up:

 

DSCF8475_spcr2K.jpg

 

I just found out I haven't got a clue what I am doing when preparing smaller versions of images for the forum: an image that looks nicely saturated and pleasantly crisp/sharp on my 4K monitor looks quite bleak and rather soft when I just checked it on my wife's laptop which has a 1920x1080 monitor.

Edited by George_P
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much, George!  I often find that images do not look as good on laptop screens as they do on desktop monitors.  That is certainly the case with my desktop Eizo 22" ColorEdge compared with an Asus 22" monitor on another machine, let alone a laptop.

 

Here's another lichen photograph from the same hike as the other two.

 

XT2F0970_lzn-X3.jpg

Edited by merlin
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much, George!  I often find that images do not look as good on laptop screens as they do on desktop monitors.  That is certainly the case with my desktop Eizo 22" ColorEdge compared with an Asus 22" monitor on another machine, let alone a laptop.

 

Thanks to you sir, you share your images very generously and for a good cause, too. Makes me wonder if you are outdoors 24/7.

Do you just resize when you make the smaller version or do you use different sharpening or make other changes  ?

 

My lichens are from the High Tatra mountains, this one is from 2634m altitude. 

 

 

DSCF8534_ac2k.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful photograph, George!  Mine are from about 2200 meters altitude.

 

My post-processed uploaded images are all at 2560 pixels on the longest side, and 300 dpi.  I often add a bit of additional contrast, and sometimes a tad more saturation, but that is all.  No sharpening, and almost all of the images are uncropped.

 

The forum software creates the smaller sizes (and probably lower dpi) that are displayed, but if you click on them you will get to the originals.

 

Generally I go on two hikes weekly, most of them near my home.  It looks like you live near some amazing mountains!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Some small lichens and other things in this photo taken from the hull of the Peter Iredale Ship Wreck at Ft. Stevens State Park in Oregon.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...