Jump to content

Left Canon for Fuji


DaveXT

Recommended Posts

Hi I am Dave, for many years I shot with a 70D and too many lenses, got totally fed up with carrying the kit about and tried my mates X-T20 and loved it.  Last week I traded some of my lenses at Jessops for a new Fuji X-T20 + XC 16-50mm + XC 50-230mm and three years warranty.  I totally love this little Fuji so much so that in a couple of weeks, I will be getting the X-T2 + 18-55mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Are you keeping the X-T20 if not why so quick to the X-T2? I am just curious nothing else as to why. I being also a Fuji 'newbie' with a X-T2. In my case I still have some manual M Leica lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you keeping the X-T20 if not why so quick to the X-T2? I am just curious nothing else as to why. I being also a Fuji 'newbie' with a X-T2. In my case I still have some manual M Leica lenses.

 

 

Hi Stephen, my plan was to get the X-T20 and kit lenses, as I was getting the X-T2 + XF 18-55mm anyway.  The X-T20 will be my back up camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...