Jump to content

Time-lapse sequences, automatic exposure time


16thEarl

Recommended Posts

G'day – just uploading this in case anyone finds it interesting…

 

Using my X-T2, I did a timelapse sequence of sunrise the other morning (it’s the first 20 seconds of this video: https://youtu.be/aHztl6DsNTU). I’ve been experimenting with sometimes using fully manual settings, and other times leaving the camera to automatically choose a shutter speed. It was on auto shutter for this sequence.

 

I’ve graphed the resulting brightness levels from the 580 images taken. While waiting 37 minutes for the image analysis to complete, my son and I were arguing about whether the graph would show a line or a curve. It ended up being something neither of us expected. (See attached image…)

 

I was a bit surprised by the distinct shifts in brightness at the points where the camera decided to adjust shutter speed, for example from 1/20 to 1/27 at frame 56, or from 1/20 to 1/17 at frame 303.

 

Looking at the EXIF metadata made me wonder: Does anyone know the difference between "Exposure Time" and "Shutter Speed Value". These tend to be different for the same image; for example, exposure 1/27, shutter 1/28.

 

Are others using Fujifilm X-T2/X-T20 cameras for time-lapse? What sort of settings do you find give the best results?

 

Cheers, Warwick

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by 16thEarl
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm not very experienced with timelapse but I recently heard a podcast where they discussed 'Arsenal'

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2092430307/arsenal-the-intelligent-camera-assistant-0

 

This tool has many features that support timelapse. During the podcast they mentioned not to set the camera to auto during timelapse due to the camera fluctuations in exposure (e.g. as sun goes behind a cloud)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...